69 million page views

Not a conspiracy theory but a description of realpolitik

Reader comment on item: Still Blaming Conservatives for Lee Harvey Oswald
in response to reader comment: Well-known mystery

Submitted by Phil Dragoo (United States), Nov 27, 2013 at 03:40

PermReader (Russia), I am familiar with a limited frivolous notion regarding the moon landings--which were quite real and had they been other, the Soviet Union would have been quick to so indicate.

As for the FBI and the Towers, that is a separate matter with its own government investigation and civilian critics.

Lee Oswald was used by no less than James Angleton for a false defector program, by David Atlee Phillips and James McCord against the Fair Play for Cuba Committee (with Oswald working with Guy Banister), and was demonstrably not on the floor in question nor in possession at any time of the weapon; nor could the frontal wounds be administered from behind.

The military-intelligence leadership removed the obstacle to the Vietnam War and other facilitators served sponsors whose interests transcended the political, national, religious or strategic.

The hallmark of the modern assassinatin is the masking of the motives and methods of the sponsor behind a deniable scapegoat.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Not a conspiracy theory but a description of realpolitik by Phil Dragoo

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)