69 million page views

Interpreting the Israeli Elections

Reader comment on item: Interpreting the Israeli elections

Submitted by Marjorie Stamm Rosenfeld (United States), Jan 28, 2013 at 22:09

Why are these Iranians talking about Israel's "illegal occupation" of the West Bank? This is not Palestinian land. It's land to which the Jews were given title by the 1920 San Remo Resolution, the 1922 Mandate for Palestine, and the 1924 Anglo-American Treaty (which incorporated the Mandate word for word).

What's more, Article 80 of the U.N. Charter preserved the rights of peoples under previous legal instruments. The Mandate for Palestine called for the Jews not only to settle closely on the land in Palestine from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, "including state lands and waste lands not required for public purposes," but to be encouraged to do this. The Jews (and now Israelis) have a right to settle on all vacant land in Palestine not owned by individual Arabs. Most of the land in Palestine was public land belonging to the Ottoman Turkish (not Arab) government, not privately owned land. The Jews are settling on their own land! That is not a war crime! There are 22 Arab states in the world and 56 Muslim states. The Jews have one tiny state, that's 1/640th the size of what the Arabs and Muslims have.

I can't see the demands of the Arabs and Muslims as anything but incredible greed. Let Netanyahu remind the 52 nations of the League of Nations that ratified the Mandate for Palestine and Japan, which signed the San Remo Resolution, as well as the United States, which ratified the Mandate via the Anglo-American Treaty, of their obligations under these legal instruments. Said instruments have never been amended or abrogated and are still in force.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (12) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1Indifference is how I feel. Israel needs a true Jewish government. [54 words]Phil GreendFeb 9, 2013 10:11203355
Video tip to save time and sanity [49 words]EdwardFeb 3, 2013 15:10203100
The full force of their army? [69 words]ybrandstetterJan 31, 2013 10:29202999
2The fogotten problem [110 words]Gunther SchiffJan 29, 2013 00:48202928
1Interpreting the Israeli Elections [270 words]Marjorie Stamm RosenfeldJan 28, 2013 22:09202920
2A million dollar reward! [264 words]Abu NudnikJan 28, 2013 10:20202894
1Oriana Fallaci on Arafat [49 words]UgriJan 30, 2013 04:42202894
1state for peace and the open triangle of exchange [273 words]mythJan 28, 2013 07:46202888
Yes Myth, great points [86 words]saraJan 28, 2013 18:56202888
3No possibility of peace [121 words]JFKARJan 28, 2013 06:15202884
2Reply to British Sunday Times and its filthy Scarfe Jew-hate cartoon [192 words]Palestinian propaganda promoted by BritzJan 28, 2013 03:17202875
British Perfidy [76 words]EdwardFeb 3, 2013 07:04202875

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)