69 million page views

what the future may hold

Reader comment on item: Reflections on the Second Presidential Candidates' Debate

Submitted by Jules Posten (United States), Oct 17, 2012 at 14:03

anyone who watched this debate can draw their own conclusion as to who won or lost. if constantly interupting Mr Romney, aided and abetted by the "moderator" Miz Crowley counts as debate points, the the Prez won, but what did he win? he admitted to the Roses in the Rose Garden, that there was a terror attack in Libya, but not to the American People, he should get the Thorn Award. the Prez has shown great ability in hiding behind the very ample skirts, of Hilary Clinton and Candy C, is there Truth Award for that?

let's be very frank about this, the Prez's first four years has shown what a second four years would mean for the USA, worse because he cannot run again and a lame duck as president leaves him free to work without congress on his plans for us. let us pray that the American Voter has the sense to see what this would mean for our country and not return him to office, and further pray that the damage he has wroth so far can be repaired quickly.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (27) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Obama's words in the Rose Garden the day after the Benghazi attacks on the consulate and CIA compound [95 words]Rory SquaricOct 23, 2012 02:06199984
1I hope you have since realized what the problem with this is [175 words]saraOct 25, 2012 18:32199984
Debates and voters [99 words]seanOct 19, 2012 19:12199929
Romney momentum [76 words]simonOct 18, 2012 21:13199916
Shallow [19 words]James GrayOct 18, 2012 02:49199903
Reflecting on Reflections [1212 words]Anatoly TsaliovichOct 18, 2012 02:19199902
2Exactly Wrong, Mr Pipes. NONE of this matters anymore! [171 words]stanley bOct 17, 2012 18:49199889
Romney won on substance [267 words]Kepha HorOct 17, 2012 21:02199889
What does 'indigo' feel like? [262 words]stanley bOct 18, 2012 20:13199889
I said I'm from Indigoland [46 words]Kepha HorOct 18, 2012 21:41199889
Indigo- Brush up on my colors... [196 words]stanley bOct 20, 2012 18:53199889
Peace, Bro. [25 words]Kepha HorOct 22, 2012 21:00199889
3It feels like the sky is falling ~ [320 words]saraOct 17, 2012 18:41199887
1REFLECTIONS ON SECOND PRESIDENTIAL M DEBATE [125 words]samOct 17, 2012 15:03199885
1what the future may hold [183 words]Jules PostenOct 17, 2012 14:03199883
2Obama - Teflon man - the left's man [93 words]Sailor46Oct 17, 2012 12:20199882
Overstating the case [47 words]MikeOct 17, 2012 08:07199876
1Accuracy [65 words]Susan H. SomervilleOct 17, 2012 03:33199873
2Sept 12: "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation" [91 words]CarlOct 17, 2012 02:02199872
1Not lying but twisting the truth [319 words]saraOct 17, 2012 19:27199872
2You're reading far more into my comment than you ought to. [574 words]CarlOct 17, 2012 20:08199872
2I just research the facts, as should you [719 words]saraOct 17, 2012 20:29199872
I'll look at the hearings again. [208 words]CarlOct 17, 2012 21:00199872
1Disgusting and vile [104 words]MarkOct 18, 2012 12:16199872
2Lying again. [87 words]batya daganOct 17, 2012 00:41199869
Fox News fact checkers say Obama mentions "act of terror" in his Rose Garden speech on Sep 12 [124 words]Mark JamesOct 17, 2012 00:37199868
1Missing the Point [96 words]Joe FalkOct 17, 2012 19:09199868

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to what the future may hold by Jules Posten

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)