69 million page views

Hate Speech?

Reader comment on item: Why mocking Muhammad is not hate speech

Submitted by Peter Herz (United States), Oct 1, 2012 at 05:59

In the USA, "hate speech"laws or definitions ought to send up red flags with every lover of the First Amendment. I'm convinced its just a Gramscian ploy to criminalize the thoughts and speech of their political opponents.

Yes, we can't shout "fire" in a crowded theater, but it's just too instructive that the heirs of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement, those unabashed admirers of Stalinist regimes everywhere, are now pushing for limits on serious First Amendment rights now that they're running things.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)