nuclear deterrence toward Iran :: Reader comments at Daniel Pipes

Submitted by myth (Germany), Mar 7, 2012 at 06:56

Considering a strike against Iran that is both preemptive and nuclear has serious implications. It means that one believes the Iranian regime cannot even be deterred by nuclear weapons.

Like Dislike

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (37) on this item

	Title	Commenter	Date	Thread
	Obama assures Netanyahu on efforts to stop Iran's nuclear program [95 words]	stas	Mar 27, 2012 05:45	194798
	Ahmadinedjad 45min exclusive interview with ZDF german TV [264 words]	myth	Mar 19, 2012 20:09	194528
	What is the point? [117 words]	stanley b	Mar 19, 2012 18:31	194525
	There's no tellin'! [229 words]	There is NO Santa Claus	Mar 19, 2012 22:37	194525
	Advance knowledge of attacks [134 words]	stanley b	Mar 20, 2012 20:16	194525
2	OBAMA IS NOT IRISH [100 words]	NEIL CAMERON / 6443	Mar 22, 2012 18:03	194525
1	Dear Neil [137 words]	There is NO Santa Claus	Mar 26, 2012 22:04	194525
1	Hello Stanley B [266 words]	There is NO Santa Claus	Mar 26, 2012 22:28	194525
	"0'Bama" Clarification [365 words]	NEIL CAMERON / 6443	Mar 27, 2012 20:20	194525
	Of course Obama's Irish! [314 words]	Kepha Hor	Apr 1, 2012 09:17	194525
1	Not writing about Iran [28 words]	Edgar Davidson	Mar 15, 2012 13:27	194413
6	Some food for thought [136 words] w/response from Daniel Pipes	There is NO Santa Claus	Mar 13, 2012 08:03	194325
1	Thank you for your response, Dr. Pipes [160 words]	There is NO Santa Claus	Mar 18, 2012 21:37	194325
	No one can justify using a nuclear power to stop enemy [61 words]	sephardi	Mar 10, 2012 19:38	194236
	Human Justification Initiated Nuclear Capabilities: Human Justification Will Be the Cause For Its Use [457 words]	M. Tovey	Mar 28, 2012 15:59	194236
1	new Israeli ambassador in Germany sending an emotional message [310 words]	myth	Mar 10, 2012 08:51	194226
1	Lots of sub-texts [110 words]	Jon from Euroland	Mar 7, 2012 11:15	194082
	Superior firepower [36 words]	Duncan	Mar 7, 2012 04:12	194062
1	By May it will be too late [94 words]	NuritG	Mar 7, 2012 03:26	194057
2	It is entirely possible, reasonable AND lawful for Israel to use its tactical nukes to destroy Iran's genocidal project/regime.... [42 words]	Adina Kutnicki, Israel	Mar 7, 2012 00:43	194051
	Dear Mr. Adina [54 words]	Debanjan Banerjee	Mar 23, 2012 13:25	194051
	Train of Thoughts [87 words]	Jay1	Mar 6, 2012 20:20	194041
2	Israeli nukes? [65 words] w/response from Daniel Pipes	Ari Zade	Mar 6, 2012 14:39	194016
	Tactical Nukes [201 words]	Zan (Australia)	Mar 6, 2012 22:42	194016
	tactical nukes [186 words]	rick oneil	Mar 6, 2012 23:09	194016
3	We owe this to our Children. [51 words]	Michael Hanni Morcos	Mar 6, 2012 23:59	194016
	nuclear deterrence toward Iran [29 words]	myth	Mar 7, 2012 06:56	194016
	ok, "tactical" [79 words]	Ari Zade	Mar 7, 2012 22:08	194016
	good points [69 words]	Ari Zade	Mar 7, 2012 22:14	194016
	what is behind the absurd? [74 words]	Ben	Mar 18, 2012 10:21	194016
	Yes, and so? [156 words]	stanislaus	Mar 21, 2012 17:15	194016
	action required [149 words]	myth	Mar 22, 2012 05:41	194016
	Nukes necessary? [188 words] w/response from Daniel Pipes	Keith	Mar 31, 2012 00:16	194016
	thank you for the info, Keith [58 words]	Ari Zade	Apr 3, 2012 03:36	194016
	More on that [628 words]	Keith	Apr 4, 2012 11:47	194016
	Reply [95 words]	Keith	Apr 4, 2012 13:01	194016
	wow, thanks again, Keith [66 words]	Ari Zade	Apr 4, 2012 21:15	194016