69 million page views

Seems to me that Mr. Kepha needs to study history more

Reader comment on item: Washington Puzzles over the Mujahedeen-e Khalq
in response to reader comment: As for Mossadegh...

Submitted by Debanjan Banerjee (India), Dec 4, 2011 at 11:26

Dear Mr. Kepha ,

Most of your comments make it clear that you know nothing about either Mossadegh or the politics in Iran in the 1950-s. Listen , it was UK and USSR which together conquered Iran during the second World War , so it was legitmate for the Iranians to see both these two powers as hostile.

The condition in the refinery in Abadan which allowed Britian to survive the Blitz also ensured that Britian stole all the oil from Iran without offering proper compensation to Iran. Can you believe it , that Iran never had any board of directors or auditors to look in the books of Anglo-Persian oil company (now BP) before Mossadegh. The British intentionally prevented educating Iranians from managiing their own oil successfully.

First Mossadegh wanted a 50-50 sharing of Iranian oil profits with Anglo-Iranian corporation (like thearrangement US worked out with Saudi Aramco at the same time) but when the British refused to give a 50-50 deal , Mossadegh had no option to nationalize the Anglo-Iranian oil.

"Nor was he a liberal. He let his rankled sense of entitlement as kin to the deposed Qajar dynasty drive him into the arms of the Tudeh."

My ANswer --- > It seems that you are unaware that you yourself said that Tudeh were communist so how on earth the Tudeh would welcome someone like Mossadegh who according to you was a relic of the old Qazar dynasty ?

On another note , remember FDR supported USSR in his war against Hitler so does that make FDR a communist ? Your past comment just points to that way.

"Perhaps he and his Tudeh friends should have won. It would have given the Soviets a bloody guerrilla war in the Islamic world during the 1950's and '60's, and might have resulted in several of the clerical families that gave us the 1979 revolution being decimated."

My Answer --- > Perhaps Hitler should have won. It would have been great had that bald abomination Winston Churchill been shot by the victorious SS in that sceanario. That filthy bald abomiation Churchill was responsible for the great Bengal famine which killed thousands of innocent Indians during the second World War.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
correct me if I'm wrong... [337 words]Peter HerzNov 29, 2011 22:13191314
more on MEK [101 words]Peter HerzDec 1, 2011 05:55191314
revised thinking [147 words]russell wohlfordMar 7, 2013 11:19191314
linkage [8 words]Consul-At-ArmsJun 24, 2011 12:19186743
Arabs need a secular dictator [90 words]MotkeJun 17, 2010 01:11174480
Now, should Israel trust Clinton's umbrella [60 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDAug 12, 2009 11:05160103
Regarding Mujahideen-e Khalq [74 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Debanjan BanerjeeMay 11, 2009 20:51155254
The MeK is a secular alternative -- they deserve our benign support at least [143 words]Charles MartelAug 13, 2009 11:20155254
Remember Mossadeq [121 words]Charles MartelAug 16, 2009 05:34155254
As for Mossadegh... [117 words]Kepha HorNov 29, 2011 21:53155254
Seems to me that Mr. Kepha needs to study history more [369 words]Debanjan BanerjeeDec 4, 2011 11:26155254
Dear Debanjan [227 words]Kepha HorDec 9, 2011 16:49155254
Dear Kepha [743 words]Debanjan BanerjeeDec 10, 2011 12:27155254
2I met these folks [518 words]russell wohlfordAug 24, 2006 11:2053901
Read some history [436 words]The Historian...Nov 19, 2006 12:4953901
response to "The Historian" [1093 words]russell wohlfordNov 22, 2006 02:4053901
Response to "the Historian" [305 words]RSTAug 9, 2009 00:0653901

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Seems to me that Mr. Kepha needs to study history more by Debanjan Banerjee

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)