69 million page views

Food for thought for West

Reader comment on item: Another Islamist Soldier Turns Terrorist in Texas
in response to reader comment: Why are we allowing in any more muslim immigrants ?

Submitted by Ravi Ranjan Singh Bharat Panthi (India), Aug 23, 2011 at 12:34

This is copy of letter I mailed to British friends, but is for all. I am a Bhartiye (an Indian), 100%, born and living in India. With my prejudiced mind, I should be saying, 'Whites are paying for sins of their ancestors'. But I strongly say Whites have got first right over Britain, any problem between Irish or English, labour or conservative is their own problem, and I have no business to poke my nose, unless there is gross violation of human rights or gross injustice, yes in that case as citizen of the planet I may intervene. But, it is not so, British are capable of handling their own affairs, and I should concentrate on my problems.

To some extent its true, British Colonized India and in the process atrocities were committed. But that should not be impediment in our present relations, nor does it justify illegal migration from erstwhile India i.e. India Papistan (Papistan, Pap means Sin, Pak means pure in Urdu and Hindi) Bangladesh, or from anywhere. Some British officer somewhere tortured one Indian say in 1924, now Indians can bully English teenager in London! ; They don't and can never do, but Pak-wolves Packs/ Badeshi Bandits do it alone or in league with other Muslim alliance. I strongly condemn violence against citizens with British ancestry or legal migrants. Illegal migrant should not be there anyway, so violence against them or no violence against them is irrelevant issue. British friends, please don't take is otherwise, nor do you need my advice, but I am sharing my thought with you.

After collapse of Raj, British naturally migrated, there were Indians who stood by the government of that time i.e. British Raj, all of a sudden became untrustworthy, treacherous, creatures worth condemnation and prosecution in native land. All those who were opposing British, or arrested by British for reason what so ever became Nationalist Hero overnight! As an Indian I support the cause quit India by Indians at time. Why should there be British or outside Raj in India, I support Tilak 'Freedom is my birthright'. But things were not as simple as they seem, all of those opposing British were not Nationalists or Patriots. Nor all not opposing British were dishonest or anti-Indian.

Anyhow, anyone who saved British family or was simply working as employee was at risk of being labeled hazardous element. Now as British's moral duty, promises, assurance for those who stood with British, it was necessary to protect or accommodate them in new world order. I still say all those who supported British Raj were not anti- Indian Indians, but they looked at things from different angle. Some Patriotic Indians Preferred British because there sudden exodus may collapse India, or there can be power vacuum and worst power will be captured by those who don't deserve it; and unfortunately it happened so. Who rules erstwhile British India, how its ruled, was no more British problem or issue, British were facing new reality and challenges, abandon extra luggage of glorious past that seemed liability in worthiness sense, though Raj days memories served as emotional food for particular section and generation.

India was taken over by Jihadists, axed exactly on 14 Aug 1947. One part was exclusively Muslim India that is now Papistan and Bangladesh and other was joint, shared India. So Jihadists took one part exclusively for Muslims and in other part Muslims were again equal Partners. This happened in connivance of a first generation Muslim, In fact who was not Muslim but wanted to prove more Muslim than any real Muslim,Mr. Mohmad Ali Jinnah Thakar, he sold the dream of Papistan, one other hand there was one Dhimmi, Mohan Dass who was Muslim by conviction and deeds, projected himself as Hindu or Secular Hindu, and in grab of Hinduism/liberal Hinduism allowed Muslims to be equal Partners in the Non-Muslim Part too, what is now called India, and arranged killing uprooting and converting Hindus/Sikhs in Darul-Haram of Papistan. While all this was happening British were indifferent, not realizing the transfer power to Jihadists, with rotten ideology, as a unruly Nation to Jihadists will be a school of 'Doctrine of Destruction' the situation that you are escaping from now, will not let you escape and will catch you napping in your own country, in your own home, the indifference of British at that time and convince of Mohan with Jihadists is the disaster for that British now, British are paying, Indians are paying the whole humanity is paying.

Papistan has become factory of Jihad, naturally as its very foundation was on 'Two Nation Theory' named by Jihadists. Jihadists claimed that India is one country in that we share but there are Two Nations Muslims and Hindus/non-Muslims; in fact it is 'There is One Planet that Humans and Jihadists share but there are Two Different Worlds of Human and Jihadists. While realizing the importance of protection and migration for their ex-loyal subjects, British did not realize elementary difference between Hindu/Sikh loyal and Jihadist loyal. For Jihadists all the vows at the time of migration were just tool to get into Britain to accomplish the Jihad and work for the real force he is loyal to and that is ISLAM/JIHAD.

While signing the pledges with grim expression, Jihadist laughs at stupid piece of paper called undertaking/vow/oath/swearing/bond/affidavit etc., and undeveloped mind of its author who believes that Jihadist will be tamed with that piece of paper , Jihadist knows he/she is already faithfully married his Jihad ideology, that runs through his/her blood. If the Reality is British need Migrants, then be sure who you are allowing, try to distinguish amongst migrants. To have a dream of better life for migrant is not only natural for migrant but vital for hosts.

Dear British please learn to distinguish and discriminate. I mentioned above some British action somewhere during Raj cannot justify bullying of White now, Indians don't bully anyone, But Pak-Jihadi always does, please differentiate between two, it is good for you and good for us. But be sure other than financial dream, does migrant carry any other agend? Not allowing or trusting anyone is not going to help, trusting anyone is suicidal. Now this unfortunate event of rioting may be a deliberate attempt, or may by itself prove to be reason for getting your concentration away from real enemy called JIHAD. Basic difference Black (if Christian) teen is rioting that he misguided, if Jihadist is rioting he is guided; by his book, elders, and clergy. As three armed Jihadist men, who were on street challenging anyone and everyone including so called looters and hooting away law and order agencies. Being sure because of the terror of their background no dhimmi will dare them, but a group challenged and in the process overconfident threesome got killed.

Now as usual jihad propaganda machine and political correctness theory took the central stage and three armed mobster men were made martyrs and their challenger as criminals. It is propagated no Muslim migrants are not Jihadists, at least not anymore now , rather it is projected they were never a liability to your country, were never law abuser, and never spitted at dead bodies of English Soldiers, so mistaken White must love Jihadists, Jihadists are law abiding, protective citizens and only hope for Britain against all evils. Since Sikhs are brave so Jihadists should be accommodated by Sikhs and English alike, and black Christian should perceive them as 'racial victim cousin'. Jihadists are using the riots to prove, LOVE JIHAD, stoning, child rape are minor phenomenon. Black and Caribbean Christians are devil. Whole world and specially England is at risk because of few black or Caribbean rowdy teens.Hero of riots the Jihadis can save. This incident is being used to lessen the crimes of Jihadists which are spread over every continent and inch of this planet and for1400 years.

It is projected that these unemployed teenagers are more dangerous than Jihadist Icon Laden, so British should stop worrying about, Rapist Holy man and his rotten cult, Laden, Papistan, Afghans, Somalis or bombing, public stoning, Shariah sneaking, rape, loot, love jihad and Jihad itself. Now since so many shoes/clothes/electric gadgets being looted, so accept Jihadists as brothers, accept their demands, get your towers blown, girls rapped, faith overrun, values thrown out and in return Jihadists will protect you from few dozen Black/Christian teenagers who roam with sticks. Conclusion: These riots were bad, as any riots are. But it was not a massacre and the real genocide that is just round the corner. Don't let these riots be used as forgetting basis for carnages of Jihadists and stop the process of uniting human race against Jihadists.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)