No, the crosses would be destroyed now

Submitted by jennifer solis (United States), Mar 22, 2008 at 23:23

It means the crosses would be destroyed now, as the Cross is symbolic of the Son of God, which is an insult to Allah's followers (Allah has no son).

It absolutely disgusts me that the Saudi Consultative Council busies themselves with such maudlin self-absorbed rot while completely ignoring the lack of "respect for religion" which eminates from within their OWN religion and country.

THE epitomy of hypocrisy.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".