69 million page views

Your Information on Alevism is devious and misconstrued

Reader comment on item: Alevi Identity: Cultural, Religious and Social Perspectives

Submitted by Veyis Haydardedeoglu (Australia), Nov 29, 2007 at 19:18

As an Alevi decent, I found the context of your website is quite insulling to the scholars at large and Alevis in general. To correct the historical mistakes on your website, I invite you to explore my website www.alevilik.com.au from downunder Australia.

It is with no doubt that the Alevi philosophy was introduced to so-called Asia Minor in today's Anatolia early 12th century. This philosophy was later transmitted into the Eastern Europe e.g. Macedonia, Albania, Greece in the mid 16th century through freethinking Turcoman Dervishes under the guidance of Ahmet Yesevi's "Mysteries of Divinity" (Divani Hikmet) . This was regarded by a greater majority as a "Spoken Koran" rather than the centuries old "Written Koran".

Mysteries of Divinity have been pioneered by Haci Bektash, the scholar and freethinker into today's modern Turkey in the early 12th century. In essence, this philosophy was fundamentally inspired from mediaeval ages of King Suleiman thus interpreted into the living tribes of Turks for many years. The influence of matured Turkic belief namely Shamanism have been manifested throughout the years also enthused from other beliefs such as Buddhism, Hindu, Judaism, Christianity, Islam and ultimately bearing a new harmonized belief called "Mysteries of Divinity" . As regarded by many intellectuals that Mysteries of Divinity is homogeneous and heterodoxy in belief endowing tolerance and benevolence in its fundamentals, honesty an sincerity to mankind, universal love and peace and science and knowledge as the prime source of synergy.

For your information, in Alevi Order the women are considered as devine. Your should base your findings on academia rather than hearsay.

Regards

Veyis Haydardedeoglu/ Melbourne-Australia.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

I regret you found this review insulting. As should be evident from it, I do not claim to know the subject but have summarized some of the main points of the book under review. Therefore, your argument is with its editors and contributors, not me. To put it differently, my findings are precisely based on academia, not hearsay.

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Your Information on Alevism is devious and misconstrued by Veyis Haydardedeoglu

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)