69 million page views

Liberals in despair and confusion in the way Le Figaro endorses with "honor"

Reader comment on item: The Most Amazing Book Editing Error?

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Oct 23, 2007 at 02:43

1. The Editing Error again corroborates that Liberals are spiraling down in despair. Countless examples on this Web Site denounce it as a pattern, through critical errors.

2. Being edited /endorsed by Columbia Press immediately takes away any credibility.

3. Now, I'm very confused:

In the following link, http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cup/catalog/data/978023113/9780231131308.HTM

The "Le Figaro" newspaper states:

"...(The CWD of I. is) An antidote to confusion . . . Antoine Sfeir emphasizes that 15 million Arabs are not all Muslims, that all Muslims are not Islamists, and that every Islamist is not a terrorist."—Le FigaroNewspaper.

Has the Le Figaro clearly shown its poor English, or their extreme liberalism and support for radical Islam made them show how downhill they are heading. Read with me the above statement:

1. 15 Millions Arabs are not all Muslims....

Well where, what Arabs and what Statistics Sfeir/ Le Figaro are counting on ?

2. How many are Muslim and how many belong to what other religion and what's the prediction for the increase in the Arab no Muslim population in this "?" place?

3. "...All Muslims are not Islamists"....What an ODE to stupidity. If All Muslims are not Islamists why the "jihad" so much cited by the author?

4. Finally, the corroboration of the negligence and again stupidity of the far (false) left and liberal kind:

"..Every Islamist is not a terrorist"...???????

He denies the core of the whole drama in between Islamists (the source of totalitarian Islam) and Muslims, (the base for Radical Islam and Moderate Islam).

Sfeir, according to Le Figaro states that radical Islam is not terrorism.

Shall I read that All islamists are not terrorists?

Is Le Figaro having problems with spoken English or this is the information they want to pass on?

Dr. Pipes states on http://www.danielpipes.org/article/954 that:

"...Islamism is an ideology that demands man's complete adherence to the sacred law of Islam and rejects as much as possible outside influence, with some exceptions (such as access to military and medical technology). It is imbued with a deep antagonism towards non-Muslims and has a particular hostility towards the West. It amounts to an effort to turn Islam, a religion and civilization, into an ideology."...

So indeed, Islamism (despite a very light good side- to "some" MUSLIMS) is the source of indoctrination towards what CAIR terrorist organization defends:

"..."Those who stay in America should be open to society without melting, keeping Mosques open so anyone can come and learn about Islam. If you choose to live here, you have a responsibility to deliver the message of Islam ... Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.""Fighting for freedom, fighting for Islam, that is not suicide,"..."They kill themselves for Islam." (Ahmad Praises Suicide Bombers)-

Omar Awad.

...

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Next Comment >>

Reader comments (6) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Counter Point to inform- Counter Punch to Preserve.- Action Needed. [73 words]YnnatchkahNov 2, 2007 02:21112886
Carelessness [33 words]David W. LincolnOct 28, 2007 04:36112485
I can beat that--I already have [35 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Irfan KhawajaOct 23, 2007 23:26112223
What about the title? [84 words]jennifer solisOct 23, 2007 15:52112203
Liberals in despair and confusion in the way Le Figaro endorses with "honor" [482 words]YnnatchkahOct 23, 2007 02:43112175
Incoherence and Illogic Share a Brain [19 words]Brian HallOct 25, 2007 03:16112175

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Liberals in despair and confusion in the way Le Figaro endorses with "honor" by Ynnatchkah

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)