Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Senator Boxer
Reader comment on item: CAIR's Legal Tribulations

Submitted by R Simenauer (United States), Jan 9, 2007 at 19:04

Not sure if this is where this comment should go, but I have noticed a conspicuous absence on these pages on the commendable (albeit somewhat belated) effort by Senator Boxer to recognize the compromised nature of CAIR and rescind a recent "certificate of accomplishment" given to one of its members, Basim Elkarra. Although I have been frequently at odds with her positions, I think she needs to be publicly commended for a very important and correct decision.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Daniel Pipes replies:

Perhaps you missed the mention at http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/194.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (10) on this item

Title By Date
The Flying Imams and Their Supporters [700 words]gary fouseJul 21, 2007 01:23
The Flying Imams and Their Supporters [699 words]gary fouseJul 19, 2007 23:52
IZLAM - NA - PHENOBIA [24 words]Joe KaffirJul 16, 2007 14:37
Testifying [30 words]Mark RothJun 5, 2007 08:40
Horowitz was right all along [79 words]David W. LincolnJun 4, 2007 15:35
Imagine that [28 words]John KaiserMar 20, 2007 15:28
⇒ Senator Boxer
[w/response] [77 words]
R SimenauerJan 9, 2007 19:04
A Huge Mistake [318 words]Ken WillisJan 9, 2007 10:58
Isn't this the same line they gave Barbara Boxer in California [10 words]Mark MajorJan 8, 2007 06:41
The judgements so far. [5 words]lawal suleh s/shanuFeb 7, 2006 07:32

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page