Bush: Tyrant than Saddam
Reader comment on item: Saddam Hussein: A Political Biography

Submitted by ndimila madullu (Tanzania), Jan 3, 2007 at 08:39

The hanging of Saddam Hussein was perceived differently accross the world. Some became happy, others sympathetic, but ultimately we all witnessed unexpected end of that giant man. I am not supporting what saddam did to his people but so bored with propaganda spread by US and UK since their invasion till the end of Saddam.

They claimed Saddam to possess weapons of mass destruction but failed to prove that allegation. Saddam was a good man to US by then when this great nation in tussle with socialist states, especially Russia. Once that tussle ended and Russia socialism collapsed, the man became redundant. US and UK claimed that their invasion aimed at bringing peace and democracy to Iraqis. What kind of democracy?

George Bush together with his young brother Jeb stool some votes in Florida state so as to win the election. Is this a kind of democracy Bush wants to institute in new Iraq? Saddam was rulling Iraqis, and not americans, so how comes americans felt sense of no democracy while they are not ruled ones. This calls for a general watchout to all leaders in the world. US coupled with her great coalleage UK are great tryrants in the worlds. They are able to throw away any leader in the world so long is not complying to their wants. So come up all leaders, join to protest these tryrants. I guess the next target is Pres Ahamadinejad!

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.