Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Respecfully Disagree
Reader comment on item: The Future of Kadima
in response to reader comment: Kadima will garner the most votes in the foreseeable future

Submitted by Stuart Bliwas (United States), Nov 21, 2006 at 19:41

I respectfully disagree with Mr. James and agree 100% with Dr.Pipes. Olmert has proven himself to be at best an incompetent Prime Minister.

Kadima was voted in based on faith and trust in Ariel Sharon. With Sharon totally and permanently incapacitated and Sharon's successor a proven incompetent, Kadama will totally disappear at the next election.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (6) on this item

Title By Date
Kadima is a party of hope [81 words]jon purizhanskyNov 26, 2006 07:45
The Real Hope For Kadima [31 words]Stuart BliwasNov 28, 2006 15:03
The Kadima Paradox [161 words]MosheNov 23, 2006 14:59
Self preservation drives out wooly mindedness [125 words]David W. LincolnNov 21, 2006 20:40
Kadima will garner the most votes in the foreseeable future [76 words]Mark JamesNov 21, 2006 17:11
⇒ Respecfully Disagree [55 words]Stuart BliwasNov 21, 2006 19:41

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page