Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

The Kadima Paradox
Reader comment on item: The Future of Kadima

Submitted by Moshe (Israel), Nov 23, 2006 at 14:59

I totally agree with Dr. Pipes' analysis. I myself went through all the stages he describes:

In January, with Sharon's incapacitating stroke I was convinced that Kadima will fall apart in a matter of days.

When in spite of all my expectations, Kadima was still there at the elections, I was dead sure that it will be dealt a disastrous beating at the ballot box. But instead, to my consternation, Kadima won.

Following the March elections, in a record short period of less than 6 months since forming the Kadima led government, this coalition of miserable opportunists has managed to drag Israel from one disaster to other. And they continue to prove their incompetence day by day.

If I wouldn't be here to see it, I couldn't believe that such a thing is possible. It doesn't make sense! But it's here, and it's going on.

For how long?.....Your guess may be as good (or probably much better than) as my guess.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (6) on this item

Title By Date
Kadima is a party of hope [81 words]jon purizhanskyNov 26, 2006 07:45
The Real Hope For Kadima [31 words]Stuart BliwasNov 28, 2006 15:03
⇒ The Kadima Paradox [161 words]MosheNov 23, 2006 14:59
Self preservation drives out wooly mindedness [125 words]David W. LincolnNov 21, 2006 20:40
Kadima will garner the most votes in the foreseeable future [76 words]Mark JamesNov 21, 2006 17:11
Respecfully Disagree [55 words]Stuart BliwasNov 21, 2006 19:41

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page