Submitted by Ralph C Whaley MD (United States), Aug 7, 2006 at 11:39
Dear Dr. Pipes,
Your writings imply that you believe that Islam is being corrupted by a false understanding expressed in acts of terrorism and war against fellow Muslims and non- Muslims alike. You propose a different understanding of Islam that would be compatible with peaceful arrangements between all men.
The problem in such an approach is failure to understand the nature of Islam and more broadly the nature of religion in general. The essence of all religion is faith. All serious religionists agree on this point. Faith is a belief in the absence of evidence and/or in controversion of evidence. Men of faith who confront men who do not accept faith have no recourse to reason based dealing with non believers. They specifically reject reason and appeal to their faith which leaves them only one course of action, FORCE.
For a detailed explanation of the corollaries of Faith and Force all srious thinkers should read Ayn Rand's essay "Faith and Force: The Destroyers of the Modern World" in "Philosophy: Who Needs It" available at book stores everywhere.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
Daniel Pipes replies:
"Your writings imply that you believe that Islam is being corrupted by a false understanding expressed in acts of terrorism and war against fellow Muslims and non- Muslims alike."
Not so. I have repeatedly argued against the "hijacked Islam" thesis - see "Has Islam Been Hijacked?" - and acknowledge radical Islam as a valid, if evil, reading.
Submit a comment on this item
Reader comments (9) on this item
| Title |
By |
Date |
⇒ Dr. Pipes evasion [w/response] [177 words] | Ralph C Whaley MD | Aug 7, 2006 11:39 | | Common now... [115 words] | Bob Rosen | Aug 7, 2006 10:40 | | No establishment clause in Oz [53 words] | Dan Schwartz (Cherry Hill, NJ) | Aug 7, 2006 08:12 | | Christian and Secular Humanist Council of Saudi Arabia- how many minutes would that survive? [250 words] | Dr Nicholas Beecroft | Aug 3, 2006 11:20 | | Islamic Imperialism [355 words] | Dr Nicholas Beecroft | Aug 3, 2006 11:17 | | ↔ Yeah and [56 words] | StatingtheObvious | Aug 7, 2006 16:45 | | ↔ Foolish Comments [58 words] | Infidel | Aug 7, 2006 23:09 | | Very Pity [79 words] | Muhammad Arief | Jul 22, 2006 01:08 | | ↔ Very Pity [125 words] | Jeff in Kabul | Aug 5, 2006 11:28 |
Comment on this item
See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.
|