69 million page views

A double-edged sword?

Reader comment on item: The University of Chicago vs. Victims of Terror

Submitted by Andrew Bartlett (United Kingdom), Jul 20, 2006 at 09:00

Now that this precedent has been set, will we see the US Government defending itself, and its cultural heritage, in the courts of El Salvador, Nicaragua, Chile, etc., countries who suffered terribly at the hands of US-funded murderers and torturers?

Or is this simply a legalistic dressing on what would otherwise be seen as the exercise of brute power?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (10) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Absurd [151 words]M.Nov 19, 2014 05:42219379
Good Muslim and Good American ? [350 words]Nathan RosenblattAug 17, 2006 21:1353285
Good Muslim? [92 words]Linda HaslamNov 8, 2007 08:4753285
Nice [31 words]M.Nov 19, 2014 05:5753285
A double-edged sword? [59 words]Andrew BartlettJul 20, 2006 09:0050294
Are U.S. Courts Biased against Iran? [22 words]steven LJul 16, 2006 20:2949844
Silly ! [86 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Bob B.Jul 16, 2006 10:1449800
i am cyrus [40 words]cyrusJul 8, 2006 08:2949207
Interesting, a new American Way of War [261 words]John ProvidenceJul 7, 2006 23:0049186
immaturity [29 words]HARRAKJul 5, 2006 21:3648986

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to A double-edged sword? by Andrew Bartlett

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)