Submitted by tariq(United Arab Emirates), Apr 29, 2006 at 11:27
i see very few of your articles talking about the real Islam. eg:
"Though neutral on Islam, I take a strong stand on Islamism, which I see as very different. Islam is the religion of the Qur'an and the Sunna; Islamism is the political path of Hasan al-Banna, Abu'l-A`la al-Mawdudi, and Ayatollah Khomeini. "
Good to see that you make the distinction but i see very few such articles. mostly you focus on terrorists who are not following Islam. You should also write that those terrorists are doing wrong and in this take a balanced approach every time.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
Daniel Pipes replies:
Actually, I write a great deal about Islamists who are not terrorists. But whether they use violence or not, I consider Islamists to be valid Muslims who do follow Islam.