4 readers online now  |  69 million page views

For Coco and Muslim logic revisted one more time!

Reader comment on item: Do I Win a British "Islamophobia Award"?
in response to reader comment: for Dhimmi no more

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 12, 2006 at 17:11

My dear coco I just have a few questions for you:

1. In Surat al-Fatiha do you read the word MLK (this is the rasm of the word) as: Maalki (meem alif lam with a kasra and kaf with a kasra) or maliki (meem lam with a kasra and kaf with a kasra) and notice that the alif and the kasra below the the lam and kasra below the kaf were added to the defective rasm by the brazen Muslim 3Ulama and for sure the alif and the two kasras are not the word of your Allah. And so much for the unedited Qur'an.

Now the rasm of the word MLK can be read as: Maaliki or the owner of (you will find such reading in the 1923-1924 Cairo Qur'an) , or Maliki or the King of (you will find such reading in the Tunisia Qur'an printed in 1969 and it is a correct reading too). So Muhammad either recited such word as maaliki or as maliki and it cannot be both. So how did Muhammad recite such a word: MLK? And your guess is? How do you explain that my dear coco? Do you know what this really mean:

A. It is that the Quranic material pre-dates Muhammad and was already old when he died in 632CE. But this would detach the Qur'an from Muhammad!

B. Or that the Qur'an existed as logia and pericopes and was not canonized until the 3Ulama stabilized the language of the text in the 3rd century of Islam. Well this would detach Islam from Arabia!

So which one is it my dear coco?

So much for the same and unchanged Qur'an.

2. As for the question posed by the Jews of Mecca to Abul Qasim about the very simple and profound Aristotelain question: "If God created you, then who really created God?" You will find this story in "Sirat Rasul Allah" in Ibn Hisham's recension of Ibn Ishaq's sira, pages 571-572. And you must pardon me my dear coco but your Allah and his rasul had poor command in matters of Aristotelian logic.

Well, we are told that in response to such question Muhammad lost his temper but Gabriel arrived with the revelation of Q112!! Again your Allah and his rasul had no clue about the so called "circular reasoning"! And the Jews of Mecca were corretely not very impressed by your Allah and his rasul command of logic then they posed the next question to Muhammad: "but how did Allah do it? what limbs did he use?" Then we are told that Gabriel then came with Q39:67:"and they have estimated god falsely for at the resurection he shall grasp the entire earth and the heavens folded in his hands." The Jews were for sure not satisfied with such bogus answer but Muahmmad the poor thelogian and whose logic was defective thought that the matter was closed.

So did you learn something today our dear coco?

As for the word: al-ssamad (notice that there is a shadda above the sad letter) this is a word that puzzled the Muslim masorites (those that examined the language of the Qur'an from Tabari to Suyuti) so to tell me with great confidence that you really know what this word means is nothing short of your poor Muslim education!

3. As for Muslims and al-Hajj your little gem about many do not go because they are young or they are too old to go is nothing short of being bizarre logic!

Stay tuned for more!

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (47) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Alas, you have far more competition these days. [15 words]Anon.Apr 2, 2016 20:16228677
Dr. Pipes Lost - Recount [48 words]Mark DFeb 26, 2014 02:14213434
2Islamophobia can be a genuine condition [217 words]PrashantFeb 17, 2014 14:38213257
6And here is my list of the 2014 awards for Kafir-phobia, Christianity-Phobia, Jewish Phobia, Hindu and Buddhist Phobia [143 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 12, 2014 18:32213163
GEE DIDN'T THE FBI JUST CUT OFF TIES WITH CAIR [131 words]JennFeb 13, 2009 12:12150389
Honored by CAIR [14 words]LynnFeb 8, 2009 15:46150059
1moderate islam! what is this? [114 words]muhammad abdullahFeb 5, 2009 14:52149889
1For every finger CAIR points at someone....... [193 words]LynnFeb 5, 2009 09:38149872
3Islam as a form of insanity [223 words]Ken BesigFeb 5, 2009 05:07149854
Religion and Philosophy [114 words]Asif AbdulkarimMay 20, 2008 11:50129296
2The entire Muslim Ummah needs to Apologise for its actions [462 words]IbrahimFeb 7, 2009 02:53129296
1You will shock the contents of the Koran . [66 words]AsifFeb 11, 2009 12:01129296
Islamophobe, [86 words]Jean LacroixNov 18, 2006 18:2366533
1THE NEW PC-'PSYCHIATRY' and why. [256 words]gordon weareFeb 16, 2009 14:2466533
1Hate speech [58 words]Octavio JohansonNov 13, 2006 04:5165975
Condi Rice should not be on the list for her "occupation humiliation" homologue [30 words]Dr RJPOct 25, 2006 00:0264426
Hmmm. What do the '06 nominees have in common? [37 words]dahozhoOct 23, 2006 12:2464219
If you win ... [38 words]SeanOct 19, 2006 11:1961521
I will be very surprised if Dr. Pipes is chosen by the BRITISH muslims [122 words]Jeff BurkeOct 19, 2006 07:0161496
Now we know what Islamophobia entails [51 words]VijayOct 18, 2006 13:4061400
You should have won. [56 words]Right of Center FilipinoOct 9, 2006 22:5659444
No apologies [194 words]dfwhiteOct 7, 2006 15:3859230
congratulations [27 words]kai mastersOct 2, 2006 13:2158602
Islamismophobe [57 words]tariqJun 6, 2006 09:0047160
For Tariq and "real islam"! [6 words]dhimmi no moreAug 6, 2006 08:0847160
to dhimmi [34 words]tariqAug 7, 2006 05:0847160
For Tariq: You still did not answer my question! [13 words]dhimmi no moreAug 7, 2006 19:5747160
"Real Islam" [117 words]Lactantius JrOct 2, 2006 17:4947160
For Lactantius and the real Islam! [28 words]dhimmi no moreOct 3, 2006 07:0147160
to dhimmi no more [15 words]tariqNov 2, 2006 04:2747160
For tariq and Muslim logic! [29 words]dhimmi no moreNov 2, 2006 18:3947160
to dhimmi [14 words]cocoNov 5, 2006 06:2747160
For Coco and Muslim logic revisted! [741 words]dhimmi no moreNov 5, 2006 17:3847160
for Dhimmi no more [988 words]cocoNov 11, 2006 22:1147160
For Coco and Muslim logic revisted one more time! [588 words]dhimmi no moreNov 12, 2006 17:1147160
For Coco and Muslim logic revisted! part deux! [1021 words]dhimmi no moreNov 14, 2006 07:3847160
For Coco and Muslim logic revisted! part trois! [139 words]dhimmi no moreNov 16, 2006 07:3747160
dhimmi [126 words]cocoNov 28, 2006 23:2947160
But my dear Coco you did not answer my question! [52 words]dhimmi no moreNov 29, 2006 18:4447160
idealised version of islam [43 words]G.VishvasFeb 5, 2009 10:5047160
Real Islam [89 words]Imam Ahmed MuhammedFeb 11, 2009 14:0547160
Our dear Mullah Ahmed and what is really islam [648 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 12, 2009 07:3947160
real islam [9 words]taniaFeb 14, 2009 18:1147160
Don't be a fool [54 words]AdilJul 12, 2015 02:4347160
runner up? [98 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
tariqApr 29, 2006 11:2744535
Valid Muslims? [31 words]tariqJun 13, 2006 10:3244535
1Hello Tariq [45 words]ZibakhannaFeb 7, 2009 02:2844535

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to For Coco and Muslim logic revisted one more time! by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)