4 readers online now  |  69 million page views

The leftist progressive threat to values and beliefs

Reader comment on item: The Demon in Liberalism
in response to reader comment: Problems with liberal education

Submitted by aidan maconachy (Netherlands), Aug 2, 2019 at 14:11

You make good points on sex education and you are not alone in your concerns. Extreme age-inappropriate content in sex-ed programs and what can only be described as gender-ideology pushed by pro-abortion and LGBTQ organizations has resulted in widespread revolt on the part of concerned parents and allied organizations.

In addition to protesting, engaged parents in the US and Canada have directly taken on their local school boards but more often than not find they get suppressed, tuned out or sidelined. This is typical of the arrogance of liberal group-think progressivism. It has contempt for traditional values and beliefs derived from centuries-old standards of morality. The so-called "progressive" movement that has only been around for a few short decades in the modern era... knows better.

An international movement against this insidious agenda in the schools has been growing. A former teacher who was at the forefront of parent protests in Texas is quoted in the Catholic World Report: "We are uniting with parents across the globe to demand that our rights as parents be respected regarding the teaching of sexuality and sexual orientation. Hands off our kids!"

The reason the progressive agenda has been able to infiltrate our institutions so quickly in recent years is due to the complicity of mainstream liberal media and the new tech "gods." They have been instrumental in promoting and normalizing this agenda... be it gay rights, radical feminism, transgenderism, pro-choice activism, gender bending pronoun advocacy, gender-ideology in the schools and related issues. Voices opposed to the leftist program are invariably presented on these platforms as reactionary, misinformed or out-to-lunch. Critics get muted and sidelined, as has been the case for example with pro-life video content.

Radical progressive advocacy rides roughshod over centuries of received wisdom and traditional morality codes. It is an agenda that would have been a total anathema to earlier civilizations and still is in fact an anathema in countries around the world where it cannot make any headway at all. Vladimir Putin has gone on record saying that while homosexuality is tolerated in Russia, there is no tolerance for what he refers to as "homosexual propaganda" in the schools and contends that children should be left alone and not interfered with. Sage advise when you consider the bizarre gender experimentation that has been making headlines in the West, often involving very young school-age subjects.

My earlier example of The Guardian and others projecting progressive values as the prescribed way forward is given weight by content that while not obviously propagandistic, makes assumptions that aren't an accurate reflection of mainstream reality. However it is a progressive outlook that is given enormous traction in leftist media worlds and so appears to have much wider acceptance than it actually does. Let's not overlook the fact that the non-involvement of parents in protests does not imply consent.

The opposition to the progressive agenda runs deep but given the punitive nature of liberal apparatchiks and their group-think followers, many are afraid to publicly express dissent for fear of being victimized.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (19) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1The Sacralization of Politics [244 words]ReverendAug 3, 2019 13:06252284
The Idol in liberalism [138 words]aidan maconachyAug 23, 2019 16:11252284
Drift from moderation to extreme.... [177 words]AaronAug 1, 2019 19:20252187
Liberals have used WW2 as [87 words]aidan maconachyAug 23, 2019 16:21252187
2A Terrible Nexus: Islamic minority and liberal democratic politicians [319 words]PrashantJul 31, 2019 21:51252135
Dangers inherent in liberal positions [17 words]aidan maconachyAug 23, 2019 16:24252135
terminology suggestion [37 words]Alex EizenbergJul 22, 2019 05:13251777
If only conservatives believed in noncoercion! [99 words]SteinJul 24, 2019 15:53251777
Personalized attacks on gay people is wrong [103 words]aidan maconachyAug 23, 2019 16:35251777
3The liberal/progressive con job [396 words]aidan maconachyJul 21, 2019 01:43251738
Problems with liberal education [107 words]aishaJul 31, 2019 00:59251738
1The leftist progressive threat to values and beliefs [504 words]aidan maconachyAug 2, 2019 14:11251738
2Also, it's equality gone berserk [435 words]DaveJul 15, 2019 09:50251551
Stalin's policies resulted in the death of millions [92 words]aidan maconachyAug 23, 2019 16:52251551
Since they're illiberal, one ought not refer to them as 'liberals'. [8 words]Anon.Jul 15, 2019 05:44251542
semantic confusion [26 words]Paul RothbergJul 15, 2019 14:32251542
Liberalism and Communism Have Exactly One Difference [335 words]David RyanJul 15, 2019 00:33251538
Leftism is simply a con game. [59 words]Michael SJul 15, 2019 21:44251538
Liberal appropriations [23 words]aidan maconachyAug 23, 2019 16:56251538

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to The leftist progressive threat to values and beliefs by aidan maconachy

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)