69 million page views

Bizarre interpretations of Surat al-Baqara 178

Reader comment on item: German and Austrian Media Outrage Me
in response to reader comment: Attention Prashant: The genuis Abul Qasim!

Submitted by Prashant, Oct 1, 2018 at 21:43

Dear Dr Pipes, Your frequent reader DNM drew my attention to Surat al-Baqara 178. DNM correctly stated that this verse of Quran drew from the original 'an eye for an eye' dictum of fairness in justice. As I often do, I researched DNM's assertions and found that DNM was right. Quran indeed "expands" the 'eye for an eye' concept to include 'free for free' and 'male for male' and 'female for female'.

DNM found an interesting contradiction in the above statement and pointed out that if this rule is applied literally it will lead to some female being killed in retribution if a man kills a woman. Correct! The literal interpretation of this verse surely recommends the killing of a woman or free or slave if the victim is a woman or free or slave.

But I tend to believe that, as He has often done in Quran, here also, Allah spoke somewhat ambiguously. All He meant was that to be fair punishment should match the crime.

Even if we take the implied meaning of Surat al-Baqara 178 there is a lot to think about. Mahatma Gandhi famously put this verse into perspective. He said that the 'an eye for an eye' justice will leave two blind men. That should end the discussion on this topic! Mahatma Gandhi essentially clarified that violent retribution should not be imprudent. But there is more to it!

When I researched the above verse on the the Internet I discovered an even more disturbing thing. You see, the debate on various Islamic sites is not whether the original Jewish dictum or the Quranic version of it or Gandhi's modernistic version of it is more valid. The Islamic debate is more bizarre. Islamic debate tries to interpret 178 even more literally! The questions are raised whether it is this law applies to only believers or to all. Or whether 178 overrides another similar verse 5:45? Or are pre-islamic pagans responsible for the mention of slaves?

I found this debate bizarre because the real issue about 178 is not whether we kill a slave or a man or a woman. The real issue about 178 should be under what circumstances advice such as Gandhi's is more applicable than 178.

Unfortunately Islamic debates always slip into literal interpretation and trivialities. Islamic debaters do not try to understand the implied meaning. They just get lost in the literal interpretation. Islamic scholarship should pay attention to this.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (32) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Welcome [85 words]JD WillSep 30, 2018 12:32245136
Travel companions [227 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MalcolmSep 28, 2018 05:10245093
Western Europe won't be safe much longer [35 words]RealityCheckSep 29, 2018 23:08245093
1Orwell's best of language vs the worst of language in this article [281 words]mythSep 25, 2018 08:10245053
2The Silent Majority. [68 words]Reynald de ChatillonSep 23, 2018 02:38245005
2Incompetence too [45 words]AnonSep 22, 2018 19:22245001
Putting "hometown" in quotes. [14 words]AnonSep 21, 2018 14:52244976
Mr. Pipes rightly complains, but the choice of company? [247 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MalcolmSep 20, 2018 14:01244959
1Linz is Austria's third largest city [16 words]GabrielSep 20, 2018 11:09244957
1Boat Ride on the Rhine Instead/ [397 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
RobertSep 20, 2018 09:17244955
1Time to rethink your opinion of Trump [29 words]GeorgeSep 20, 2018 07:42244954
5The dying MSM and its all about lost revenue [294 words]dhimmi no moreSep 20, 2018 07:30244953
1The dying MSM, here and in Europe [194 words]Michael SSep 21, 2018 06:09244953
4The dying MSM the Grey Lady included! [156 words]dhimmi no moreSep 21, 2018 16:28244953
The Cloud666 News Network [618 words]Michael SSep 21, 2018 18:23244953
Michael: Muhammad and Revelation! [133 words]dhimmi no moreSep 24, 2018 14:59244953
Quran II? [220 words]Michael SSep 25, 2018 18:02244953
3Michael: Can Islam be reformed? [125 words]dhimmi no moreSep 27, 2018 06:02244953
"Islam needs a pope" seems contradictory [47 words]PrashantSep 28, 2018 01:46244953
Islamic Reformation - No Hope to be Found in That [270 words]M ToveySep 28, 2018 12:27244953
1Correcting a typo [56 words]PrashantSep 29, 2018 18:28244953
The tragedy of Islam is that it should have only one "Pope" instead of too many [491 words]dhimmi no moreSep 30, 2018 07:49244953
Change is coming may be not soon enough! [119 words]dhimmi no moreSep 30, 2018 08:04244953
Attention Prashant: The genuis Abul Qasim! [228 words]dhimmi no moreSep 30, 2018 11:06244953
1Bizarre interpretations of Surat al-Baqara 178 [407 words]PrashantOct 1, 2018 21:43244953
Outstanding Article Owed a Follow Up [26 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
DajjalSep 20, 2018 05:38244951
Great article! [3 words]robertoSep 20, 2018 02:06244948
2Those Crazy Mixed Up Europeans Talk It Over [193 words]DaveSep 19, 2018 09:44244929
2German and Austrian Nationalism and the European Union & Seeing the Forest for the Trees [178 words]RobertSep 19, 2018 09:34244928
7ridiculous accusations yet classical antisemitism [117 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
mythSep 19, 2018 04:52244924
3Switzerland perhaps the last hope of German journalism [48 words]mythSep 19, 2018 04:36244923
2Were there many frivolous accusations of devil-worship in the dark ages? [83 words]Anon.Sep 19, 2018 18:28244923

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Bizarre interpretations of Surat al-Baqara 178 by Prashant

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2018 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes