Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Sharon will succeed. Bush will follow.
Reader comment on item: Lost Diplomats Just Step on the Gas

Submitted by Sally Vee (United States), May 7, 2002 at 03:32

Another great column which answers two of my questions posted in the other May 6 column: What should Sharon do next, and what should Bush do next.

But Laina's letter is compelling, and she certainly comes from the same side of the fence as I, and most of us here, do. I think she's having a wobbly moment, like me. (Please, God, may the wisdom of Margaret Thatcher visit Sharon and Bush and all of us who so badly want the same end result.)

I think the moment is approaching when the story will be told--and when it is most difficult to stand firm without giving an inch. My observation of Sharon is that he can bear this tremendous weight, and he will likely hold to an absolute line. He's a farmer, a military man, an old man who wants to retire IN HIS OWN SAFE COUNTRY, and he sees the success and popularity of the tough line he has finally taken--regardless whether world leaders/pundits/intellectuals give him credit or even respect. (The verbal beatings he's received may even help to harden his resolve.)

Sharon is the guy who should step on the gas and ignore all yellow lights flashing "compromise" and "capitulate" in front of him.

Getting the U.S. administration on board will be more difficult and take longer. Maybe the first step in Bush's education is to take notes while Sharon teaches War Won-O-Won. Bush is a fair and honorable man and I think he learns best from experience.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (23) on this item

Title By Date
Pouring gas.... [33 words]Tim KozakAug 5, 2002 16:23
Pouring Gas on a Fire [197 words]OsamaJun 24, 2002 12:24
Proactive Solution needed........ [177 words]Christian BrotherMay 21, 2002 00:19
Agreed, but when? [128 words]Dean EsmayMay 11, 2002 15:20
They Just Might Have Learned Their Lesson [132 words]Frank LukeMay 9, 2002 22:24
Perfect Analysis [59 words]Gary AboffMay 9, 2002 21:42
US Must Stand Firm Against Arab "Anger" [210 words]Stephen A. VolkMay 8, 2002 22:57
You've hit the nail on the head! [84 words]Sandra TurleyMay 8, 2002 12:17
On Israel's 100 page report [75 words]William J. SturmMay 8, 2002 08:41
Wishful Thinking [311 words]Jeffrey G. SchwartzMay 7, 2002 11:57
The Media's Lack of analysis of Israel's 100 Page Report [54 words]Arnold H. KlauMay 7, 2002 10:13
No Shortage of Peace Plans [196 words]Yonatan ZukowskyMay 7, 2002 08:33
Cruel Hoax: Is History Repeating Itself? [178 words]William J. SturmMay 7, 2002 07:43
Don't Give Up! [95 words]Jean MartinMay 7, 2002 06:54
⇒ Sharon will succeed. Bush will follow. [246 words]Sally VeeMay 7, 2002 03:32
Great reporting of Israel-Arab history [134 words]Harold DodsonMay 6, 2002 23:51
Arafat [43 words]Allan UngerMay 6, 2002 13:37
Whoa! [77 words]Murray KupersmithMay 6, 2002 12:48
Some Other Voices Heard From [297 words]Laina Farhat-HolzmanMay 6, 2002 12:08
Use brakes, not gas. [82 words]Carol MizrahiMay 6, 2002 10:35
On the right track [72 words]Yoseph Y. RosenbaumMay 6, 2002 10:09
Lost Diplomats Just Step on the Gas [99 words]Ethan CoreyMay 6, 2002 09:55
Thank you [43 words]Adrienne Rubin-PrinceMay 6, 2002 09:14

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page