24 readers online now

99,126 comments by 26,322 readers

Go to Mobile Site

I think you are right, but you do not follow your observations to the appropriate conclusions.
Reader comment on item: Television in Time of War

Submitted by Ray Exley (United States), Aug 2, 2005 at 21:47

Dear Dr. Pipes,

I agree that you should not have to appear with crazies, and endure insults.

But, the problem is that all commercial television is about creating confict and craziness, NOT, repeat NOT about providing useful information to the public. Edward R. Morrow, and all of the standards that he embodied are dead on the cross of ratings, and the greed that is fed from the ratings.

I beleive that since most of the public gets their information from TV, that we should not turn over this important media to perveyors of trash for profit, at the exclusion of useful informaion.

But, as long as the incentives reward trash, and penalize useful information we will get trash, and you will get very little air time, as you are trying to transmit useful information. When you were disinvited it was because you refused to play a part in providing trash to the public, and you seem to think that the TV producers should be doing something that is not in their interest.

Well, I think so also, and I think that since airspace is a public entity, I feel that we should remove the providers of trash for profit at least during prime time and replace the trash with useful content.

We could demand that as the price for having exclusive use of a part of the spectrum for most of 24 hours the people who derive their income from this use, must use the prime time for non commercial education programs, and that about 20% of the gross income must be spent to provide this programming, and it must be open to presentation by all points of view, with some moderate standards of fairness and correctness. That is recreate the news departments in the model of CBS and Murrow for that time. And, if these people feel they are unwilling to do that, then they should give up their bit of spectrum, and it should be rented (not auctioned for a single fixed price) for a portion of the gross revenue of the stations.

This would only be true for stations on the airways, and a few exclusively on cable.

Because as we have seen, pure commerical use causes the bad to push out the good, because most people would rather view trash than learn something of importance.

So, don't bemoan that you are unwilling to create a spectacle to enrich msnbc or cnn owers, and work to stop this waste of precious national resources. Because they will not change, as long as this enriches them, and they feel that the proposed changes would lower their already obscene income.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (95) on this item

Title By Date
t.v. , just one more weapon of radical islam. [15 words]Phil GreendAug 18, 2007 22:30
I sympathize, but you're wrong! [224 words]J. BerkowiczAug 15, 2005 11:04
P.S. CAIR contacts advertisers [81 words]DaisyAug 8, 2005 18:57
Dave Loev - Compelling [136 words]DaisyAug 8, 2005 16:10
Pipes appearance at public debates [144 words]Milton Alter MD PhDAug 8, 2005 10:28
How large is the communications industry? [183 words]David W. LincolnAug 7, 2005 22:34
A Maxim [24 words]Derek WicksAug 7, 2005 21:19
before Iraq Const./must re-write our own [125 words]tim mayrathAug 7, 2005 13:10
Let them show their true colors [124 words]Joseph KomissaroukAug 6, 2005 22:08
To debate or not to debate [332 words]Walter ManchurAug 5, 2005 17:23
Logic behind double standards of the elitist media [620 words]Dave LoevAug 5, 2005 13:55
Mohammad....Please interpret :)) [345 words]DvoraAug 5, 2005 11:59
Mixed thoughts on these shows [192 words]Sean H.Aug 5, 2005 10:55
Pipes / Lipstadt debates [151 words]J SchamrothAug 5, 2005 09:18
Television/Debating [29 words]Kermit J. Halperin, D.D.S.Aug 5, 2005 09:17
media tolerance of terrorism [266 words]barry kumarAug 5, 2005 02:51
Re: Once again you've nailed it [303 words]Reuben HorneAug 5, 2005 01:46
Debate on TV [365 words]Andrew L SullivanAug 4, 2005 23:29
Idiocy of our future-blind liberal media is appalling. [58 words]Ephraim LiorAug 4, 2005 20:31
Fair and Balanced? [88 words]Mark RothAug 4, 2005 19:44
Great Job! [103 words]Bruce BoymanAug 4, 2005 19:13
A Very Difficult Issue [383 words]Ron ThompsonAug 4, 2005 18:08
Appearing on TV [99 words]ALLEN GINSBURGHAug 4, 2005 17:34
Let it Rip! [107 words]Kate WrightAug 4, 2005 16:52
Talking Heads, Balking Heads [70 words]Steve MullanyAug 4, 2005 16:37
Teaching Others a Lesson at your (our) Expense [518 words]KarynAug 4, 2005 16:36
Don't legitimize what is illegitimate [153 words]Lawrence AusterAug 4, 2005 16:35
Fine Daniel Pipes Article on TV and War in Aug 2 NY Sun [157 words]Aharon MayneAug 4, 2005 16:27
Terrorism and mass media [421 words]Stephen SchwartzAug 4, 2005 15:56
Amen! [19 words]Frank VeranoAug 4, 2005 15:53
yes but....... [175 words]Lily SteinerAug 4, 2005 15:34
Disappointment [159 words]Francois MedioniAug 4, 2005 15:27
Appear for a moment, say your piece, then make a dignified withdrawal... [61 words]Dean FreemanAug 4, 2005 14:49
I applaud your ethics... [79 words]Dean FreemanAug 4, 2005 14:45
Enemies of Freedom [77 words]S. PulincherryAug 4, 2005 14:28
We are at war ! [153 words]Don MarshAug 4, 2005 12:57
A needed step - but with caution [382 words]David B. AroninAug 4, 2005 12:32
TV in Time of War
[w/response] [171 words]
ChayajaneAug 4, 2005 11:27
#590 "Television in Time of War" [195 words]Lowell ByrdAug 4, 2005 09:21
BBC
[w/response] [22 words]
JonathanAug 4, 2005 08:23
لهم الدعم المالي..والمعنوي وهو برهان الإلت [325 words]mohamedAug 4, 2005 07:35
Mute Button [20 words]Eli StoltzfusAug 3, 2005 21:44
Absolutely correct! [123 words]J.S.Aug 3, 2005 17:55
Write to the Advertisers [176 words]DaisyAug 3, 2005 17:31
Re those who wish you to provide 'balance' [230 words]DanAug 3, 2005 17:26
This is SO Correct! [78 words]Kathy O'LearyAug 3, 2005 17:14
But don't you know pro-American views are extreme? [102 words]Ben ShniperAug 3, 2005 16:43
Way To Go [44 words]alan skinnerAug 3, 2005 15:42
Response to Stephen L [82 words]RonAug 3, 2005 12:57
You're Mistaken [128 words]michael gottliebAug 3, 2005 12:13
Zootime Tv [150 words]michael cAug 3, 2005 11:10
extremists in the media [231 words]DanAug 3, 2005 10:13
TV Executives Do Not Believe We Are Really At War [141 words]L. J. MeyerAug 3, 2005 09:44
enemies viewpoint [60 words]Yvonne LawAug 3, 2005 08:56
Islamomarxists, not Islamofascists [264 words]HenriAug 3, 2005 08:35
Integrity [27 words]Jim WestcottAug 3, 2005 04:01
TV appearances [131 words]Sheila PickerillAug 3, 2005 01:36
Declining interviews on TV [153 words]Steven LAug 3, 2005 01:03
non-involvement on MSNBC TV [190 words]Terry SenumAug 3, 2005 00:16
Good decision not to disparage your image [63 words]Deborah KnefelAug 2, 2005 23:56
Agreement [117 words]John W. BeasonAug 2, 2005 22:25
There's a fourth reason [23 words]Jaime BraunAug 2, 2005 22:23
⇒ I think you are right, but you do not follow your observations to the appropriate conclusions. [438 words]Ray ExleyAug 2, 2005 21:47
The Shame was not... [89 words]Kevin HandleyAug 2, 2005 21:34
better to appear than disappear [133 words]Gordon WisemanAug 2, 2005 21:26
Only solution is . . . [13 words]MordechaiAug 2, 2005 21:22
Kudos [172 words]Peter J. HerzAug 2, 2005 21:13
CNN & MSNBC are siding with the Moslems [100 words]F.ShawkiAug 2, 2005 20:57
Russia's response [75 words]Jacob OlidortAug 2, 2005 20:56
Pipes should face all comers [207 words]William EdelsteinAug 2, 2005 19:51
TV shows [72 words]Donald W. BalesAug 2, 2005 19:21
Right On! [113 words]Dan RusenAug 2, 2005 19:18
Forum for continued lies: Television in Time of War [132 words]Mary Kay SmedstadAug 2, 2005 18:45
War as Entertainment [279 words]ArtAug 2, 2005 18:43
Media must accept responsibility [58 words]PhillipAug 2, 2005 18:33
Debate is good, depending on a subject [215 words]BorisAug 2, 2005 18:14
Who are you trying to help? [133 words]Alan M. KaplanAug 2, 2005 17:55
Retaining Professionalism [69 words]Jan VinkAug 2, 2005 17:35
Broadcasting Islamofascist propaganda [109 words]Ron CrockettAug 2, 2005 17:25
Why Not More Pipes [69 words]Dr. Lee D. CaryAug 2, 2005 17:15
Media Execs will not do the right thing -- Go on TV [70 words]Steve BalogAug 2, 2005 17:09
Your position is a sound one [105 words]Edwin BennettAug 2, 2005 17:02
Thank you Daniel Pipes [178 words]Shona DarressAug 2, 2005 17:00
You and T.V. programs. [32 words]Monty PogodaAug 2, 2005 16:51
Ratings War [48 words]BethAug 2, 2005 16:43
Agree with your decision - do not appear when dialog is impossible [83 words]Muriel EfronAug 2, 2005 16:36
Right on [125 words]Jim CrossAug 2, 2005 16:22
Television in Time of War [67 words]Menahem DunskyAug 2, 2005 16:21
Broadcasting Terrorists Views [54 words]Tom HerringAug 2, 2005 16:12
Television in Time of War [396 words]J. A. MorrisAug 2, 2005 16:04
Is 'dialog' possible? [232 words]M. ArbingAug 2, 2005 15:56
Go on TV anyway [26 words]Tom GeorgeAug 2, 2005 15:46
Do Not Appear on TV with Apologists for Terrorism [35 words]Patrick BarronAug 2, 2005 15:44
Re:"Television in Time of War" [114 words]Bill DowlingAug 2, 2005 15:39
You're right, but... [190 words]ubangiAug 2, 2005 15:23

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.