69 million page views

Could you please elaborate on a particular item?

Reader comment on item: The Way to Peace

Submitted by Sandra Goldstein (United States), May 8, 2017 at 02:55

I think you have skirted what is perhaps the most challenging aspect of this situation, namely- what, precisely, should be the terms of the peace agreement?

My guess- from your emphasis on "Palestinian defeat"- is that you would prefer for the terms of the peace to lean in favor of the Israelis, with your reason being that the Palestinians should just acknowledge their defeat, and thus consequently give up any hopes of ever getting a deal more favorable to them.

However the problem I see with such an approach, is that regardless of their "defeated" status- the more skewed the terms are against them, the less likely it will be that they'll agree to them.

And so instead of achieving peace, we just drag out this miserable stalemate into perpetuity.

But alternately, if the compromise point were to be shifted more to the middle, then achieving peace becomes more likely, because better deals have better chances of being accepted by the other side.

Although of course, we can't go too far in the direction of the Palestinians either, because likewise, then the Israelis might not be willing to agree to the deal.

In a nutshell: peace will come when a compromise point is found that both sides are able and willing to get to- and so the whole entire problem basically boils down to determining what this optimal compromise point is... that point for which there will be enough people on both sides, that can come to the understanding that having peace is better than having whatever they'd be giving up in this compromise. (These really aren't political statements... it's all just basic logic & common sense.)

Your counterpart, on the other side, would be BDS... Like you, they do not seek peace though having a mutually agreed upon compromise that's about half-way in between, but rather, you both strive for peace through a decisive, definitive defeat of the other side. And this is because (in the case of both of you) the deals that you wish for are so far tilted towards your own side's interests, that you know full well that the only way the other side will accept them, is if they're forced to, through defeat. But the main drawback to a settlement via defeat versus a settlement via compromise, is that the former could take *MUCH* longer, thus greatly delaying the attainment of peace.

For instance, in the case of BDS, they're striving for an economic defeat- but how long might it take for them to garner enough support from the world at large, for the boycott to impact Israel's economy to such an extent that it will cause Israel to succumb to the movement's demands? Well, this essentially will happen when the hardships inflicted upon the Israelis by the boycott, outweigh whatever negative consequences the Israelis feel may come about as a result of complying with the terms of the boycotters. And thus, the central question: when, exactly, might this threshold be reached- how far into the future will this be? (I'm guessing, it could be quite far...)

Whereas, if BDS were to scale back on their demands somewhat, then Israel would be more likely to acquiesce, sooner rather than later.

I've mainly been speaking in vague generalities thus far, but now for some concrete details...

Say, for example, the Palestinian "right of return": BDS's position on this- that any Palestinians (and their descendants) who had been forcibly removed from Israel, should be allowed to come back in- does have legitimacy, in principle. However this would be nigh unto impossible to implement in actual practice, being as there are upwards of a million Palestinians vying for return, and as a tiny and already very densely populated country, Israel can't realistically accommodate such a sudden, massive influx.

Thus if BDS resolutely insists on Israel taking in that many Palestinians, then I believe it will be a very long time (if ever) until this comes about. But what if instead, BDS sought something more limited- perhaps if some tangible proof were required (like say, old deeds) to confirm that the applicants for return had been forced from their property (rather than having left voluntarily, as we know was actually also the case for many of the present "diaspora" Palestinians), then the numbers of returning Palestinians may only be in the thousands, which would be feasible for Israel to accept, and so agreement could be reached much sooner with such a compromise.

And now, let's get back to you- and the question I posed at the outset, that I felt you had not addressed specifically enough: what, exactly, do you feel should be the terms of the peace? What I might speculate, based on the importance you assign to "Palestinian defeat", is that you believe the Palestinians should perhaps concede to having less land for their eventual independent state... maybe forfeiting "Area C" of the West Bank, where the Jewish settlements are primarily located? However, if the Palestinians feel that this would be an unacceptably large concession, then there will be no agreement.

Although, what if the Palestinians demanded not only Area C, but also that all the Jewish settlers in it, evacuate to Israel? Since the number of settlers is now in the hundreds of thousands, such a forced mass relocation would be tantamount to "ethnic cleansing"... But this quandary is resolvable, again, through the magic of compromise: I.e., suppose Israel were to hand over Area C (along with Areas A & B too of course, and Gaza) to the Palestinians, and, the Palestinians granted what would effectively be an "amnesty" to the Jews living in Area C, extending to them the option of being citizens of the new state of Palestine (if they should choose to remain living in the West Bank after the formation of Palestine), with full rights, protections, and privileges equal to that accorded to all Muslim and Christian Palestinian citizens...?

I contend that a compromise such as this has a better chance of being agreed upon sooner (thus bringing peace sooner), than proposals which are further out from the centerline.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

Thanks for the analysis. But you miss the point about defeat. It has to be crushing, not partial. No compromises, please.

May 11, 2017 update: The author of the above comment posted it today as an "open letter" to me at the Daily Kos, along with a remark about the brevity of my response.

Well, yes, it's brief because we are pursuing two opposite approaches. I argue that compromise won't work and Sandra Goldstein advocates for compromise.

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (99) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1Identifying the Strategic Front in War [419 words]RobertOct 1, 2022 15:55287020
2Peace - not Victory - in a Globalizing World & Globalism [1182 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
RobertJan 18, 2022 13:15278350
Contending for an Outcome that Cannot Be Predetermined Away from Peace Through Victory [570 words]M ToveyJan 18, 2022 19:58278350
1One Hundred Twenty Five (125) Antisemitic Countries in the UN - Victory Over Them [713 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
RobertJan 11, 2022 12:44278119
2Confederation of Israel, or the United States of Israel [978 words]Ludvikus aka RobertJan 5, 2022 15:22278015
1Revisiting the Scenario - Again - Victory or Defeat No Longer Viable Under Former Circumstances [178 words]M ToveyNov 8, 2021 10:53276420
Interviews reveal Palestinian irredentism among the new generation [122 words]CamelinSpaceMay 22, 2019 08:18250179
1New Strategy for Israeli Victory [177 words]HelenaMar 29, 2019 02:32248801
2Palestinian Christians [57 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
NickFeb 2, 2018 11:41242046
2Wars & Civil Wars [312 words]LudvikusJan 22, 2018 09:11241951
Ways of Ensuring Victory [70 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Richard H. ShulmanAug 29, 2017 16:44240639
A Hebrew translation is urgently needed [15 words]Yits'hak Refael HakkohenJan 20, 2018 21:51240639
2Israeis, Jews, & Jusaism vs. Palestinans, Arabs, & Islam [652 words]RobertAug 20, 2017 18:46240526
Could you please elaborate on a particular item? [1018 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Sandra GoldsteinMay 8, 2017 02:55238991
1What will happen to the Palestinian population? [140 words]PrashantJan 19, 2022 00:50238991
When the Realization of 'Palestine' Being Roman Finally Sets In [295 words]M ToveyJan 19, 2022 12:15238991
1Terrorists Fasting and Israeli Victory [126 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Andria SwitzerApr 17, 2017 21:00238581
The cost [149 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Bruce PleatApr 17, 2017 17:09238572
Two staters and other Pal supporter. [258 words]Joy Moss-RendellApr 15, 2017 05:25238514
1What was the last 20 years all about? Getting the Israelis to admit defeat! [115 words]PezDispenserFeb 18, 2017 11:16236796
Incredible Essay [31 words]Lilly SchulerFeb 14, 2017 20:19236717
it is really inconsistency, Trumps decision [8 words]ananyaFeb 6, 2017 05:08236437
2The Only possible Solution [42 words]Robert SullivanJan 28, 2017 21:05235948
You're listened to [11 words]peerJan 25, 2017 06:59235799
4French Flop - Israel Wins with British "Balfour Declaration" Support [378 words]RobertJan 19, 2017 10:04235555
2"President Trump's options for Israeli-Palestinian dealmaking" by Martin S. Indyk [884 words]RobertJan 17, 2017 11:57235434
Right You Are Mr. Pipes! [13 words]Mike BriggsJan 13, 2017 11:17235313
Israel is facing an Arab mentality that cannot be bridged – r1 [606 words]YJ DraimanJan 12, 2017 20:02235305
Keeping at it [75 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David W. LincolnJan 12, 2017 17:08235302
Truer words were never spoken [191 words]YJ DraimanJan 11, 2017 13:38235280
The Empty Promise of the 'Palestinian' Campaign - The True Israeli Victory [415 words]M ToveyJan 10, 2017 11:43235253
Peace through strength [48 words]Bob DonvanJan 8, 2017 07:47235206
1Enough is enough of allowing Jews to be sacrificed to please the anti Semitic UN [211 words]Anton LoewJan 8, 2017 07:27235204
A perpetual state of back-to-back, 10-year-long hudnas [177 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mladen AndrijasevicJan 6, 2017 07:44235168
Convincing the Palestinians of the futility of their rejectionism: [164 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Carl GoldbergJan 2, 2017 23:32235069
The way to peace. [510 words]WartyDec 31, 2016 22:37235037
Israel in history [34 words]Michael LermanDec 31, 2016 20:14235033
What does Palestinian Defeat really mean? [233 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
APDec 31, 2016 09:00235007
1Dear Dr. Pipes [160 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Debanjan BanerjeeFeb 9, 2017 09:06235007
3Debanjan Banerjee is at it again [313 words]PrashantFeb 12, 2017 16:46235007
1Dear Prashant [236 words]Debanjan BanerjeeFeb 15, 2017 21:51235007
Dear Debanjan [55 words]PrashantFeb 23, 2017 18:16235007
1Here is my suggestion [153 words]Debanjan BanerjeeFeb 28, 2017 22:18235007
1Reply to Mr. Prashant [70 words]Debanjan BanerjeeMar 6, 2017 05:41235007
There is No Voting in Heaven Where the Jewish Destiny is Already Settled [188 words]M ToveyMar 8, 2017 16:09235007
Single state solution. [11 words]Reynald de ChatillonMar 19, 2018 01:31235007
1No Palestinian state. Man will not produce a peace treaty, which is totally irrational and seeks to destroy Israel. [152 words]Anne- USADec 29, 2016 09:02234958
5Mahmoud Abbas: 100% No Jews Allowed in Palestine [325 words]RobertDec 28, 2016 09:30234940
Thank you, Daniel .. [152 words]Anne JulienneDec 28, 2016 04:45234939
2Barack Hussein Obama II Jihad Against Israel: A Hanukkah Gift: "A Stab in the Back" on [270 words]RobertDec 25, 2016 16:37234883
3I also feel cheated by Mr Obama [76 words]PrashantDec 27, 2016 01:55234883
That's no way to make a country. [63 words]Dennis GoosDec 25, 2016 01:24234878
3Appropriate Response to UN Security Council 14-0 Resolution on Settlement [691 words]RobertDec 24, 2016 14:38234874
The U.N. a useless organization [356 words]YJ DraimanJul 18, 2017 03:13234874
Double meaning Game [11 words]NadeemFeb 27, 2018 07:59234874
Another point of vue. A war on ETHICS! [93 words]stevenlDec 24, 2016 11:52234869
3Arab bullying of Israel [80 words]PrashantDec 28, 2016 03:45234869
Brilliant analysis, incorrect detail [239 words]MalcolmDec 24, 2016 04:11234866
2Irridentism and Strategic Proactivism [519 words]RobertDec 30, 2016 12:45234866
Regulation Law [24 words]MalcolmJan 21, 2017 08:21234866
Forgot a 30 years negotiation [22 words]The DiscovererDec 23, 2016 01:11234838
1Moral responsibility [197 words]Vadim AnshelevichDec 22, 2016 23:27234837
We should rename our country "Chelm" [82 words]sabasargeDec 22, 2016 22:14234835
7It is a global war, Islam against the entire non-Moslem world [238 words]NuritGDec 22, 2016 10:21234821
3Nutri G is right [203 words]PrashantDec 25, 2016 01:37234821
1This is not realistic .. [188 words]Anne JulienneJan 5, 2017 05:09234821
Europe decay is hopeful [101 words]PhilippeDec 22, 2016 03:52234816
You do not give a kid - the Arabs - a candy and hope he does not ask for more! [72 words]NuritGDec 21, 2016 23:25234815
1The Failure of Counterinsurgency [138 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Donald ButlerDec 21, 2016 09:22234806
Hard Lessons for Humanity to Learn. [181 words]M ToveyJan 4, 2017 11:20234806
Reiterating 5 Years Later What Has Not Changed for Centuries - Israel is Ruled From Zion - Zion is Ruled by the Word of the LORD [221 words]M ToveyOct 3, 2022 02:53234806
And now it could be possible [29 words]YehudaDec 21, 2016 07:46234796
2Allow me to generalize from "The Way to Peace: Israeli Victory, Palestinian Defeat" [111 words]PrashantDec 21, 2016 01:46234793
2Stateless Jewish Russians in Israel or the Diaspora [207 words]RobertDec 20, 2016 19:38234791
The fact is, the rising Islamist control over the Muslim nations has no intention of respecting treaties, or Israel's right to exist. [453 words]YJ DraimanDec 20, 2016 19:13234790
2So, Kahane reiterated this same point many times before his death. [33 words]George CohenDec 20, 2016 13:30234776
You are correct; but the situation may change suddenly [119 words]Michael SDec 22, 2016 22:00234776
1MacArthur, not Eisenhower [101 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Henry Wyatt, PhDDec 20, 2016 12:26234772
Eisenhower vs MacArthur [222 words]Sigmund DermanDec 30, 2016 10:49234772
1What about US inconsistency? [69 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
PezDispenserDec 20, 2016 10:21234769
There is no clear end. [414 words]Evan LiblitDec 20, 2016 08:45234766
Comments on Daniel. [84 words]WartyDec 31, 2016 22:59234766
2Get a Clue For Peace Sake! [62 words]DajjalDec 20, 2016 06:45234765
Writing about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict [28 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
GabrielDec 20, 2016 02:07234762
More Than "Palestinian Defeat" Required for Peace [567 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mike RamirezDec 19, 2016 18:10234760
1An Expanded Approach to Peace [244 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
ARDec 19, 2016 16:12234759
1Communism vs. Islamism: From Daniel Pipes to Richard Pipes [588 words]RobertDec 20, 2016 10:49234759
The Way to Peace: Israeli Victory Palestinian Defeat [135 words]Judith DaviesDec 19, 2016 15:51234758
The Path to Peace Now Possible with a Trump Victory [224 words]ARDec 19, 2016 15:30234757
4Magnanimity [29 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Paul RothbergDec 19, 2016 14:43234756
2The real battle is between Israel and the UN [130 words]Michael SDec 19, 2016 14:35234755
2British Mandate for Palestine, April 1920 and its consequences [743 words]YJ DraimanDec 19, 2016 13:03234751
The Secret Weapon [183 words]Barry BlackDec 19, 2016 11:41234749
2ISRAEL'S DELUSIONAL COEXISTENCE WITH THE ARABS HAS FAILED MISERABLY [271 words]YJ DraimanDec 20, 2016 18:52234749
Hope [136 words]BinyaminDec 22, 2016 14:17234749
It's too early for peace [144 words]Kenneth BesigDec 19, 2016 11:35234748
3Palestinian Refugees, Arab Spring, Islamism, Putin, and now Trump [533 words]RobertDec 18, 2016 22:56234740
5Congressman Jerry Nadler, "Worse than Kapo Jew" [301 words]RobertDec 18, 2016 20:49234734
1New Approach Requires Big Thinking [237 words]DaveDec 18, 2016 18:29234731

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)