3 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Where are the citations?

Reader comment on item: The Melungeons: The Resurrection of a Proud People: An Untold Story of Ethnic Cleansing in America

Submitted by Roger Lee (United States), Jun 25, 2005 at 15:18

I have been aware of Kennedy's theory of the Meleungeon origin since the first publication in Blue Ridge Magazine. I have watched the theory being expanded by him and others in the intervening years as more proported evidence has been revealed until, as the list of hits the last time I googled on the word shows, it has become a virtually cottage industry. One thing I am still waiting for, however, is actual citations for the primary evidence that is said to support the theory so that independent researchers could examine it. Much such evidence has been alluded to but use no more specifically than the kind of terminology used in the above review, i.e. "reports" show that one such deposit took place of Roanoke Island [of Moslem slaves no longer useful to the Portugese]. Nothing is provided that would allow locating the "reports" for examination and so we are left with unanswered questions such as why would the Portugese go to all the trouble of taking such servants on a several week voyage to get rid of them when they could have done so much easier closer to home? Such questions, of course, generate a certain amount of skepticism about the basis for the claims. This skepticism will persist as long as the "reports", "documents", "DNA tests", etc. remain unavailable for independent examination.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (3) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Book is Dated and Further Research Has Proven Much of it Wrong [72 words]History ChaserJun 11, 2009 10:01157174
Where are the citations? [224 words]Roger LeeJun 25, 2005 15:1822865
Proof involves details [244 words]Kelly locklearAug 10, 2004 16:0316289

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Where are the citations? by Roger Lee

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2018 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes