Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Inciting criminal action
Reader comment on item: Convicting [Ali al-Timimi,] the "Paintball Sheikh"

Submitted by Chris Chrisman (United States), May 2, 2005 at 11:24

You might be interested in investigating another court case that played out in India about 20 years ago. It is well-known as the Calcutta Quran Petition. In this case the court was asked to confiscate and destroy all copies of the Quran in India because the Quran contained dozens of passages which "incite violence, disturb public tranquility, promote, on ground of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious commuities and insult other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India" in direct violation of Section 95 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code. While the petition was ultimately denied, the proceedings of the trial became a best-seller in India. (See http://forum.faithfreedom.org/viewtopic.php?t=1620 and http://islamexposed.com/Library/The%20Calcutta%20Quran%20Petition

In reality, all religious texts (including the Bible) contain passages that are prejudicial against other religions and sometimes incite readers to violent acts. However, if those passages become the core message of the religious group, then that group should be reigned in. The Quran contains many appeals to Moslems to live at peace with non-believers, to do good works, and to turn away from violence. (Read, for example, Surah 25:62-76.) Why is it that these passages are rarely quoted by the Moslem fundmentalists?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title By Date
This man is still communicating with his supporters, even from jail! [55 words]Solomon2Apr 10, 2008 13:04
WWW 3 is a given [295 words]kantipalaAug 20, 2007 04:04
Good the Bad and the Ugly. [476 words]MikeSep 16, 2006 08:16
TRUE ISLAM WILL NEVER DIE WE DONT NEED GUNS BOMBS WE GOT THE AL MIGHTY GOD [40 words]ahmed muwaazDec 7, 2005 00:41
Islam is not the Problem. [185 words]HunterAug 16, 2006 12:26
Sheik converts to Cjristianity [6 words]johnOct 28, 2006 14:49
The media's bias [37 words]S.C.PandaMay 28, 2005 07:56
Response to Ahmed [73 words]YovenMay 4, 2005 16:50
Prosecution in India [72 words]Boris TsyganMay 3, 2005 15:32
Justice of Terrorists in US [680 words]Hinda BlasMay 3, 2005 15:08
Freedom of Speech is not Sedition [183 words]SteveMay 3, 2005 06:54
Thank you [46 words]Morris RombroMay 3, 2005 03:11
Free Speech to Kill [344 words]Arlinda DeAngelisMay 2, 2005 23:42
Absolutely true [77 words]Neila Charchour HachichaMay 2, 2005 22:44
Jihad comes to Small Town, USA [55 words]Maria MeylikhovaMay 2, 2005 19:01
Our Man in the Trenches [212 words]Dave M. O'NeillMay 2, 2005 18:46
Remarks - Convicting the "Paintball Sheikh" [435 words]Charles MaxwellMay 2, 2005 14:51
Is World War III Around the Corner? [343 words]Matt WilsonMay 2, 2005 14:41
Timimi deserves it [324 words]A. AhmedMay 2, 2005 14:03
The Italian example [47 words]Octavio JohansonMay 2, 2005 12:33
Moderate Islam vs radical Islam [341 words]Tzvi TamariMay 2, 2005 12:03
⇒ Inciting criminal action [208 words]Chris ChrismanMay 2, 2005 11:24
Keeping us on our toes [198 words]CMay 2, 2005 10:44
Civilization's Cancer [51 words]GRAHAM RAEL-BROOKMay 2, 2005 10:22
Thanks For Your Vigilance [40 words]D. M. MillerMay 2, 2005 09:51
No time to distinguish between speech and deed [172 words]Octavio JohansonMay 2, 2005 09:20

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page