Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Keeping us on our toes
Reader comment on item: Convicting [Ali al-Timimi,] the "Paintball Sheikh"

Submitted by C (United States), May 2, 2005 at 10:44

Thank you, Dr. Pipes, for once again ensuring that "We, the People" are made aware of important developments in the nation's war against international Islamism and its terror.

As you note, many in the media have opted not to highlight positive acts by our government in this critical war. And when they do mention these items, they choose to devote more space to the continuing whining of those who claim that Islam is targeted, etc. This double standard that is employed never fails to amaze me -- the ACLU defends Nazis and Islamism, but denegrates the government and people of other faiths. How interesting it is that hate speech that crosses the line, designed to incite and inspire people to violent action, is still defended, depending on who is doing the speaking ...

Mr. Kromberg and his associates at the US Attorney's Office of the ED Va. equally deserve our thanks and praise for their untiring work in the battle, despite many efforts by media and "human rights organizations" to minimize their accomplishments. They are a committed group of people who could make much more money and gain more sleep if they worked in the private sector.

We owe you.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title By Date
This man is still communicating with his supporters, even from jail! [55 words]Solomon2Apr 10, 2008 13:04
WWW 3 is a given [295 words]kantipalaAug 20, 2007 04:04
Good the Bad and the Ugly. [476 words]MikeSep 16, 2006 08:16
TRUE ISLAM WILL NEVER DIE WE DONT NEED GUNS BOMBS WE GOT THE AL MIGHTY GOD [40 words]ahmed muwaazDec 7, 2005 00:41
Islam is not the Problem. [185 words]HunterAug 16, 2006 12:26
Sheik converts to Cjristianity [6 words]johnOct 28, 2006 14:49
The media's bias [37 words]S.C.PandaMay 28, 2005 07:56
Response to Ahmed [73 words]YovenMay 4, 2005 16:50
Prosecution in India [72 words]Boris TsyganMay 3, 2005 15:32
Justice of Terrorists in US [680 words]Hinda BlasMay 3, 2005 15:08
Freedom of Speech is not Sedition [183 words]SteveMay 3, 2005 06:54
Thank you [46 words]Morris RombroMay 3, 2005 03:11
Free Speech to Kill [344 words]Arlinda DeAngelisMay 2, 2005 23:42
Absolutely true [77 words]Neila Charchour HachichaMay 2, 2005 22:44
Jihad comes to Small Town, USA [55 words]Maria MeylikhovaMay 2, 2005 19:01
Our Man in the Trenches [212 words]Dave M. O'NeillMay 2, 2005 18:46
Remarks - Convicting the "Paintball Sheikh" [435 words]Charles MaxwellMay 2, 2005 14:51
Is World War III Around the Corner? [343 words]Matt WilsonMay 2, 2005 14:41
Timimi deserves it [324 words]A. AhmedMay 2, 2005 14:03
The Italian example [47 words]Octavio JohansonMay 2, 2005 12:33
Moderate Islam vs radical Islam [341 words]Tzvi TamariMay 2, 2005 12:03
Inciting criminal action [208 words]Chris ChrismanMay 2, 2005 11:24
⇒ Keeping us on our toes [198 words]CMay 2, 2005 10:44
Civilization's Cancer [51 words]GRAHAM RAEL-BROOKMay 2, 2005 10:22
Thanks For Your Vigilance [40 words]D. M. MillerMay 2, 2005 09:51
No time to distinguish between speech and deed [172 words]Octavio JohansonMay 2, 2005 09:20

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page