Rich Arab Muslims feed the U-parasite system
Reader comment on item: The Arabist and Islamist Baggage of Arabic Language Instruction

Submitted by Svetlanatchkah (United States), Jan 4, 2009 at 02:30

American Universities have a long tradition in coming to third world countries, to sell their share. Under the false Slogan that once you study in America you are guaranteed for life, American Universities exploit others ignorance and dreams.

For example: A foreigner to study in the US, my experience, has to pay from 4-5 times more for a tuition, in comparison to an American, without having the right to work.

At University of WA (Seattle), at one time, while an American for a specific course had to pay $ 1500, a foreigner, had to pay $ 6200 a quarter, which end up in about $ 8500/ quarter considering food and general expenses, which also help local economy without a foreigner- having the right of taking from that economy- What a Bargain.(Jobs for foreign students are counted, few and marked in advance- being only at the University).

The level of American Universities has declined considerably for obvious reasons. Other countries like Australia have sold much better their propaganda, and others in terms of Technology, have brought proportionally many good engineers, enough to replace or complement the ones in America. So the need of studying High Tech in America, with China, India and emergent countries is a fallacy today.

Moreover, the WW crisis has contributed to the decline of foreign and local students.

So now, who can feed the increasing prices at American Universities, with many Americans that cannot pay anymore abusive prices, and many loans now inexistent?

Arab Muslims- Rich Arab Muslims....

Criticism against Arabs is not popular- contributes to bad economy and besides threats of law suits- simple as it is.

In addition to the brainless ones that parasite the U-system, as liberals and left wing brainless creatures- who will feed them? Rich Arab Muslims and their "comparsas".

Deplorable at best.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.