Submitted by Mrs. Johanna Stephens (United States), Dec 30, 2003 at 17:44
Dear Dr. Pipes,
It is not without cause that profiling was used in this case. Terrorism is fraught with Muslims; it is their play as it were. Until Muslim leaders world-wide come forth and denounce terrorism or anything close to it, there will be profiling of these people because when caught, they have been Muslims. Granted, these particular militant Muslims are not what most Muslims are about – but their leaders are not condemning loudly and publicly that they are criminals, all terrorists who have been caught are of the Islamic faith and that faith preaches ‘Deaf to the Infidels'. I am a Christian by accident of birth, in the Muslim eye; I am an Infidel? They want me dead? My trust in dark and swarthy people these days is somewhat limited.
The ‘outrage and shock' by Muslims that one of their leaders was questioned, should make those that don't want profiling, do something about telling the world that they will expel or excommunicate any Muslim from the religion if they are terrorists or help terrorists. Until Islamic leaders are forthcoming with such an edict, the world has a right to profile the known enemy. By their very silence, they are condoning terrorism and deserve the attention they are getting from those whose job it is to protect the public from terrorism.
My husband and I enjoy all your articles so very much. However, an intellectual approach to profiling at this time is not appropriate, nor will it be in the future unless the Muslim world takes an honest step in cleaning up its militants.
Happy New Year to you and yours!
Sincerely,
Johanna M. Stephens
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title |
By |
Date |
| Old timer [29 words] | Alexandeer M Smith | Jan 7, 2004 22:11 |
| Historical, and present, profiling [225 words] | Pauline T. Earles | Jan 3, 2004 16:16 |
| Racial Profiling [192 words] | Gisele Elek | Jan 2, 2004 23:26 |
| Profiling may not be good for screening [151 words] | Ronald Fox | Jan 2, 2004 17:11 |
| Profiling. [103 words] | E. & M. M. | Jan 1, 2004 20:31 |
| Profiling of Caucasion Middle American Senior Citizens [205 words] | Russell Poole | Jan 1, 2004 13:04 |
| Profiling is Intelligent [561 words] | Arlinda DeAngelis | Jan 1, 2004 11:30 |
| Re:profiling [131 words] | Dan Katcher | Dec 31, 2003 13:02 |
| A Call for Intelligent Profiling Art. No. 1385 [43 words] | S.C.Panda | Dec 31, 2003 02:27 |
| Justification for profiling [126 words] | Sidney Retsky | Dec 30, 2003 22:31 |
| Profiling is not only legitimate but indispensable [121 words] | Andrés Lozano Hirschfeld | Dec 30, 2003 19:12 |
| ⇒ Profilling [271 words] | Mrs. Johanna Stephens | Dec 30, 2003 17:44 |
| Profiling, Science vs. Instinct [107 words] | Darwin Barrett | Dec 30, 2003 16:44 |
| Minor Clarification [1059 words] | Dr. James Buccigross, Forensic Psychologist | Dec 30, 2003 15:55 |
| Profiling is necessary [68 words] | Sam Richter | Dec 30, 2003 12:13 |
| profiling [140 words] | gary loftus | Dec 30, 2003 12:00 |
| Non-resistance to profiling is actually a positive opportunity [185 words] | Boris Frenkel | Dec 30, 2003 10:45 |