Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

NYT Classic Approach
Reader comment on item: Newsweek's Jaw-Dropping Erratum

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Oct 26, 2007 at 04:48

New York Times, always deplorable approach, extremely one sided. First it titles the article: "…Mideast Hawks Help to Develop Giuliani Policy"…

Hawks may mean "…person who favors aggressive or warlike political policy"… (Babylon), so NYT already labeled ME annalists as aggressive, pro war and predators…Pretty much what I think about Chomsky and Filfhystein.

Then it criticizes directly the fact that the UN is treated with disdain- condoning as a result a whole bunch of Islamic fascists and terrorists, affecting our taxes and our freedom, mocking all us at the same time.

Yet, when citing Dr. Pipes in the picture, portray him as Islamophobic...


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (24) on this item

Title By Date
⇒ NYT Classic Approach [103 words]YnnatchkahOct 26, 2007 04:48
I'm Not a Local [90 words]YnnatchkahOct 24, 2007 02:13
"Lawful Islam" [29 words]jennifer solisOct 25, 2007 16:46
To Jennifer Solis: Sir Pipes' Audio Recording "Lawful Islam: The Greater Threat?" & Newsweek [230 words]YnnatchkahOct 25, 2007 20:10
Hello, Ynnatchkah [107 words]jennifer solisOct 30, 2007 23:24
From an old ally.... [69 words]Proud Darul HarbianOct 14, 2007 04:43
PDH - with friends like these.... [75 words]JaladhiOct 25, 2007 15:53
Hillary Clinton Carpetbagger Values [69 words]Jo Ellen Davey CohenOct 13, 2007 13:51
a compliment of sorts [58 words]DarrenOct 13, 2007 09:48
Shooting themselves in the foot [64 words]David W. LincolnOct 13, 2007 00:35
They're all off by one [15 words]StarscreamOct 12, 2007 20:51
NEWSWEEK's rabid liberalism needs to be called for what it is [58 words]Mark E.Oct 12, 2007 19:51
Where do we go from here? [90 words]CharOct 12, 2007 18:20
Newsweek's Jaw-Dropping Erratum [19 words]MikeOct 12, 2007 15:09
whole-heartedly agree [70 words]jennifer solisOct 12, 2007 18:17
All neocons look alike to "Newsweak" [25 words]Ben van de PolderOct 12, 2007 14:58
Thank you, Newsweek, for anti-Semite's Delight [196 words]Anatoly TsaliovichOct 12, 2007 14:12
square pegs and round holes [45 words]jennifer solisOct 12, 2007 13:23
Newsweek's whiny, tedious, ungrateful brats [88 words]Al GordonOct 12, 2007 13:01
Better... [110 words]YnnatchkahOct 12, 2007 12:58
The easiest way for Newsweek to fix their problems - [44 words]Wayne WagnerOct 12, 2007 12:16
Diversity? [26 words]Peter HerzOct 11, 2007 21:12
Thrilled about Daniel Pipes on the Giuliani Team! [1272 words]Joel KirsteinOct 10, 2007 23:31
YES... [36 words]donvanOct 26, 2007 16:08

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page