NYT Classic Approach

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Oct 26, 2007 at 04:48

New York Times, always deplorable approach, extremely one sided. First it titles the article: "…Mideast Hawks Help to Develop Giuliani Policy"…

Hawks may mean "…person who favors aggressive or warlike political policy"… (Babylon), so NYT already labeled ME annalists as aggressive, pro war and predators…Pretty much what I think about Chomsky and Filfhystein.

Then it criticizes directly the fact that the UN is treated with disdain- condoning as a result a whole bunch of Islamic fascists and terrorists, affecting our taxes and our freedom, mocking all us at the same time.

Yet, when citing Dr. Pipes in the picture, portray him as Islamophobic...

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".