Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Concerning Propaganda
Reader comment on item: Islamists - not who they say they are

Submitted by Hayley (United Kingdom), Sep 12, 2007 at 08:52

The family Security Matters website, which this article is linked from concerns me. It is biased and prejudiced in its teminology. The Neville Chamberlain Award section for example describes Islamists as the enemy. This generalized statement therefore states that all who follow Islam, which basically includes ALL muslims, are the enemy. This is extremely misleading. If i was a peaceful muslim i would be very worried about these types of generalizations.

Also a recent article by one of the contributing editors which was removed after some complaints was extremely biased and is guilty of inciting racial hatred and violence. This Philip Atkinson calls himself a philosopher, if that is the case then his philosophies have no basis in critical awareness or analysis, as well as being utterly wrong about Roman history! Here is a link to the article -http://marvinmoss.com/FSM-PresForLife.pdf

I will be suprised if my comment is allowed to appear on this page as it opposes the obvious propoganda which is inciting all Americans to fear all Muslims.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (15) on this item

Title By Date
pornography [39 words]iLIA TOLINov 7, 2009 22:22
pious moslems [268 words]true believerSep 29, 2009 08:00
Why negative? Because... [52 words]jenJun 18, 2009 22:50
Oh how true ! [22 words]KatieMar 31, 2009 14:48
muslims at war [30 words]serena nisha sattarOct 5, 2008 14:33
don't know either... [49 words]ShranApr 4, 2009 06:24
now you know [65 words]true believerSep 29, 2009 08:13
Sad but true... [52 words]donaldMar 29, 2008 17:38
⇒ Concerning Propaganda [168 words]HayleySep 12, 2007 08:52
An article I wrote... [207 words]Steven GalchuttMar 17, 2007 10:47
muslims [57 words]emFeb 18, 2007 02:25
A very constructive article [96 words]Husain SyedJun 12, 2004 22:54
A More Logical Analysis [96 words]Joseph WahlJul 30, 2003 14:51
The question is... [110 words]Edo Andromedo ChristyonoJan 23, 2003 21:22
In fairness [90 words]PeterNov 20, 2002 18:42

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page