Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

pornography
Reader comment on item: Islamists - not who they say they are

Submitted by iLIA TOLI (United States), Nov 7, 2009 at 22:22

I am a professional cryptographer (coder, Dan Brown type). I can comment that there's a practical reason in using porn pictures in steganographic transmission of messages. They're the most numerous by far in the web, and the least suspicious.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (15) on this item

Title By Date
⇒ pornography [39 words]iLIA TOLINov 7, 2009 22:22
pious moslems [268 words]true believerSep 29, 2009 08:00
Why negative? Because... [52 words]jenJun 18, 2009 22:50
Oh how true ! [22 words]KatieMar 31, 2009 14:48
muslims at war [30 words]serena nisha sattarOct 5, 2008 14:33
don't know either... [49 words]ShranApr 4, 2009 06:24
now you know [65 words]true believerSep 29, 2009 08:13
Sad but true... [52 words]donaldMar 29, 2008 17:38
Concerning Propaganda [168 words]HayleySep 12, 2007 08:52
An article I wrote... [207 words]Steven GalchuttMar 17, 2007 10:47
muslims [57 words]emFeb 18, 2007 02:25
A very constructive article [96 words]Husain SyedJun 12, 2004 22:54
A More Logical Analysis [96 words]Joseph WahlJul 30, 2003 14:51
The question is... [110 words]Edo Andromedo ChristyonoJan 23, 2003 21:22
In fairness [90 words]PeterNov 20, 2002 18:42

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page