Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

A Fine Dream
Reader comment on item: Suicide Reversal? Polling the Muslim world

Submitted by Rebecca Moulds (Egypt), Aug 13, 2007 at 06:02

It would be wonderful to think that Muslims are rethinking their support of suicide bombings, in an ideal world. But we don't live in an ideal world. And although "working through the system" may be just skimming the surface of this very sensitive subject, it is probably a fact that the moderate Muslims never thought of suicide bombings in the first place, and only the radical Islamists who perpetuate this type of crime.

Before returning to Egypt in November 2001, I heard a radio broadcast on CBS, interviewing people on the streets of Cairo, and their opinion of Americans and 9/11. Most of them said that the USA deserved the attack. I was shocked and dismayed at these voices. This was supposedly a random questioning of normal Cairenes, both the educated and uneducated, about their true feelings concerning this horrible crime (the 9/11 attacks) which could be put into the same category as a type of suicide bomb, the "bomb" at that time being the three planes used for their evil purposes. It is a fact that several of the pilots of those planes were Egyptian.

There is a rumbling today in Egypt of discontent with the government. The Muslim Brotherhood is gathering force again. Tourists flock by the millions each year to see the Pyramids of Giza, the Valley of the Kings and the beach resorts on the Red Sea. They were loath to return, however, after the Luxor massacre in 1997 and the suicide bombs of two years ago, but did return in vast numbers.

However, the prospect of more terrorism in this part of the world (and there's bound to be more) makes one wary of the recent Pew poll. We would all love to live together in peace and harmony with no suicide bombs anywhere, but there are no guarantees in this world against such future evil deeds.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (20) on this item

Title By Date
islam just changing tatics ... NOT goals [118 words]Phil GreendAug 31, 2007 23:46
⇒ A Fine Dream [312 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 13, 2007 06:02
Subversion and Spawning [189 words]Brian HAug 3, 2007 17:50
Wrong questions [461 words]Archimedes2Aug 3, 2007 11:30
the only way is let them taste their own medicine [54 words]susanAug 1, 2007 16:53
Re education/Aid $ tied to reform towards prosperity producing capitalism. [54 words]infosifterAug 1, 2007 07:28
One battle being won, several to go [202 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenJul 30, 2007 15:12
The Gramsci-ization of Islam [365 words]David W. LincolnJul 30, 2007 10:25
IF ONLY [212 words]IVAN CHERJul 30, 2007 07:46
NOT JUST A "TACTIC [822 words]Ron ThompsonJul 29, 2007 17:04
Suicide Reversal? "Working the System" is not tantamount to working against destruction and death ... [78 words]Paul la DemainJul 27, 2007 19:17
"Working the System" [412 words]Carol DerbisJul 28, 2007 16:49
Cultural strategies [141 words]David W. LincolnJul 27, 2007 10:47
dare we hope...? [50 words]richard landesJul 27, 2007 07:05
A better way to stop IEDs and acts of terror. [24 words]naclJul 27, 2007 02:35
A change of tactics, not a change of heart [185 words]Richard B.Jul 26, 2007 23:21
Suicide Bombing. Why? [40 words]John RJul 26, 2007 20:30
why jihad ??? [69 words]archiesSep 1, 2007 02:30
What are the motivations for suicide terrorism? [18 words]Camilla MukhammadaminovaJan 4, 2008 02:33
What difference does it make? [260 words]Romesh ChanderJul 26, 2007 17:08

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page