Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Subversion and Spawning
Reader comment on item: Suicide Reversal? Polling the Muslim world

Submitted by Brian H (Canada), Aug 3, 2007 at 17:50

Those are the two long-term strategies being followed. Subversion consists of turning the wishy-washy freedom to associate and proselytize provisions and traditions of the West against it, primarily through infiltration and duplicitous squawking at every imagined or fabricated slight. Spawning consists of using the birthrates facilitated by thoroughgoing conditioning and subordination of women to steadily increase the proportion of any immigrant population to the whole in target countries or continents (viz. Eurabia).

Auto-homicidal bombing is harrassment, not a real tactic or useful tool. Even in Iraq a significant number of the bombers are duped or drugged, and sometimes even mentally incompetent. Examples of all the above keep popping up: "Join the glorious Jihad! Here's your suicide car with the handy handcuffs!" "Whoa, there, say what?"

(Some character has a site up suggesting a fund to donate $1 million to the Jews for every auto-homicidal bombing victim. This could be refined by making it a lottery for which only Israelis qualified to buy tickets, with the prize being the previous week's millions. I suggest including the bomber in the body count, just to make sure the prize is always attractive.)


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (20) on this item

Title By Date
islam just changing tatics ... NOT goals [118 words]Phil GreendAug 31, 2007 23:46
A Fine Dream [312 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 13, 2007 06:02
⇒ Subversion and Spawning [189 words]Brian HAug 3, 2007 17:50
Wrong questions [461 words]Archimedes2Aug 3, 2007 11:30
the only way is let them taste their own medicine [54 words]susanAug 1, 2007 16:53
Re education/Aid $ tied to reform towards prosperity producing capitalism. [54 words]infosifterAug 1, 2007 07:28
One battle being won, several to go [202 words]Henrik Ræder ClausenJul 30, 2007 15:12
The Gramsci-ization of Islam [365 words]David W. LincolnJul 30, 2007 10:25
IF ONLY [212 words]IVAN CHERJul 30, 2007 07:46
NOT JUST A "TACTIC [822 words]Ron ThompsonJul 29, 2007 17:04
Suicide Reversal? "Working the System" is not tantamount to working against destruction and death ... [78 words]Paul la DemainJul 27, 2007 19:17
"Working the System" [412 words]Carol DerbisJul 28, 2007 16:49
Cultural strategies [141 words]David W. LincolnJul 27, 2007 10:47
dare we hope...? [50 words]richard landesJul 27, 2007 07:05
A better way to stop IEDs and acts of terror. [24 words]naclJul 27, 2007 02:35
A change of tactics, not a change of heart [185 words]Richard B.Jul 26, 2007 23:21
Suicide Bombing. Why? [40 words]John RJul 26, 2007 20:30
why jihad ??? [69 words]archiesSep 1, 2007 02:30
What are the motivations for suicide terrorism? [18 words]Camilla MukhammadaminovaJan 4, 2008 02:33
What difference does it make? [260 words]Romesh ChanderJul 26, 2007 17:08

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page