Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Leninist Islam
Reader comment on item: The Muslim Brotherhood's American Goals

Submitted by Vijay (United Kingdom), Aug 4, 2007 at 07:06

Now islamists in the US try the leninist method of a strong centralized organization, waiting for a long time, striking at the correct moment, making coalitions with a view to liquidating coalition partners, international islamic takeover. While Lenin was working a for future utopia of a communist society, Ikhwan is working for a past utopia of Pophet Mohammed's rule and a caliphate.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (8) on this item

Title By Date
I keep wanting to like muslims , but . . . [60 words]Phil Greend...Mar 11, 2008 11:33
If you sleep at the wheel............... [62 words]DelVeck LebedSep 28, 2007 09:26
and the problem would be? [64 words]BRAug 21, 2007 12:41
al-Ikhwan al-muslimeen v. Pakistani tablighees [228 words]dhimmi no moreAug 4, 2007 16:36
⇒ Leninist Islam [62 words]VijayAug 4, 2007 07:06
WOW, good article [26 words]BillDec 27, 2006 00:18
Why all this fighting today! [162 words]CamilleOct 6, 2006 20:58
Role of Dept. pf Ed. and FBI
[w/response] [158 words]
JEAN FURGALJun 14, 2006 11:28

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page