| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
by Daniel Pipes
September 9, 2007
updated Sep 15, 2007
| Share: |
Several publications have invited me to respond to The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, but I have desisted (other than to correct the record about myself), for three minor reasons and one major one. The minor reasons first::
![]() "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt. |
|
I myself have repeatedly been the beneficiary of the same tactical mistake: opponents of Campus Watch turned it from a minor website into a significant force by dint of relentless attacks on it; CAIR's opposition to my U.S. Institute of Peace nomination offered me an unprecedented platform for me to get out my views; and protests against my talks on campus garner them far larger audiences and more press attention than would otherwise be the case. In brief, a symbiotic relationship often exists between political opponents.
Not wanting to help the already gigantic Mearsheimer-Walt publicity bandwagon, I gently decline invitations to comment on their book. (September 9, 2007)
Related Topics: Arab-Israeli debate in the U.S., Conservatives & Liberals, Daniel Pipes autobiographical receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.