The Harassing of Noam Chomsky

by Daniel Pipes
Thu, 22 Dec 2005

Send

Comment

RSS

In an interview in the fall 2005 issue of Thought & Action, the National Education Association's journal, Noam Chomsky discusses the post-9/11 intellectual climate in the United States. He argues that political harassment on the nation's campuses "is massive" but, contrary to general opinion, it is directed against dissidents like him who question U.S. Middle East policy: "there has been extreme discrimination on campus, and very serious harassment, but it's of anyone who questions the orthodoxy, not against conservatives." As proof, he gives the examples of Edward Said and himself: "He had to have police protection at his office, at his home. He had to have a buzzer in his home so he could call the police station. That went on all the time. I've been under police protection when I gave a talk on college campuses about the Middle East." Chomsky then goes on to blame the powers-that-be: "The nation's intellectual leaders are intimidated. Did you ever hear of any protest because someone who raised questions about the dominant orthodox position on the Middle East had to be given police protection when they were giving talks on campus? I don't recall any protests about that."

Comment: One has to admire the daring, if not the accuracy, of the single most favorite speaker on American campuses claiming the mantle of persecution for himself. My research finds no instances of Chomsky's campus talks having been the subject of demonstrations and heckling, of his having personal bodyguards the entire time he visits a campus, of his needing a hundred police to control potential protests, of his having to speak in a lock-downed gymnasium, of his speech being preceded by deans warning the audience against disruption, or his having suffered the indignity of having pies thrown at him. All but the last of these, by the way, have happened to me. (December 22, 2005)

TrackBack URL for this post: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/trackback.php/557/614b0/733

Reader comments on this weblog entry

Title	By	Date
Edward Said's public appearance [102 words]	Ted Charak	May 23, 2006 20:07
↔ Your being so offended exposes your shortcomings [38 words]	jerry hop	Jul 14, 2006 11:50
What? No! [27 words]	Darrell	Mar 10, 2006 18:13
The Absent Minded Professor [97 words]	Arlinda DeAngelis	Dec 28, 2005 07:44
Just like the Islamofascists do [70 words]	Kenneth S. Besig	Dec 27, 2005 05:37
Did Chomsky question the Holocaust? [w/response] [56 words]	Warren Bell	Dec 26, 2005 22:53
↔ Oh please... [55 words]	Jim Reader	Nov 25, 2006 04:09
Chomsky old agenda. [91 words]	Ynna	Dec 26, 2005 16:44
Liberalism or Post-Modernism? [81 words]	Rob James	Dec 25, 2005 23:46
Noam Chomsky is consistently delusional and persuasive, unfortunately [52 words]	Mark James	Dec 24, 2005 22:26
↔ a friend's encounter with Chomsky [113 words]	fran cooper	Dec 28, 2005 08:55
↔ CHOMSKY IS ONE OF US... [70 words]	Daniel Cohen	Jul 28, 2006 10:29

Comment on this weblog entry

Name	Email Address (optional) Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. Top 25 recent comments Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

ADVERTISEMENTS