Abandoning Iraq to Solve the Arab-Israeli Conflict

by Daniel Pipes
Mon, 5 May 2003
updated Tue, 19 Dec 2006

Send

Comment

RSS

When I in February 2003 approvingly quoted Secretary of State Powell saying that American success in Iraq "could fundamentally reshape [the Middle East] in a powerful, positive way," I understood the U.S. goal to be bringing democracy to the Arabic-speaking countries"; little did I imagine he was referring in the first place to an imposed settlement in the Arab-Israeli theater.

Also, when one month later I predicted that "the road map is for show, not true policy, and U.S. endorsement of a Palestinian state remains remote," I missed the extraordinarily ambitious motives that lie behind the road map, the clear aspiration to solve the Arab-Israeli conflict from the outside.

Comment: This is not the first time that an American secretary of state has seen victory in the Iraqi theater as a reason to rush over to the Arab-Israeli theater; that's precisely what James A. Baker, III, did twelve years ago, as I detailed in "What Kind of Peace [to Follow the Kuwait War]?" (May 5, 2003)

Dec. 8, 2006 update: Baker has done it again. The Iraq Study Group Report whose production he co-chaired, asserts that the situation in Iraq is "inextricably linked" to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Related Topics: Arab-Israel conflict & diplomacy, Iraq, US policy

TrackBack URL for this post: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/trackback.php/54/9abe9/102

Reader comments on this weblog entry

Title	By	Date
What Possible Linkage? [114 words]	Jeff Foster	Dec 21, 2006 12:35

Comment on this weblog entry

Name:	Email Address: Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments:
Comments:
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. Top 25 recent comments Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

Daniel Pipes Blog Homepage

ADVERTISEMENTS