69 million page views

Iraq

Reader comment on item: President Bush Replies to My Iraq Critique
in response to reader comment: The Bush Response

Submitted by clarence puckett (United States), Dec 18, 2006 at 23:53

The biggest mistake we made from the beginning of the war was the lack of man-power to go along with the firepower, the first gulf war we had over 700,000 US troops and the war was over in about three weeks, with the exception of going on to Baghdad and then wiping out Sadam and his infrastructure, we would not be in Iraq Invasion part two.

We also should put a Kurd national in charge of Iraq and go after Al Sadr and his bunch of renegades and destroy them, including the mosques, they are only storage for arms and hate talk anyway, nothing holy about them or the mullahs, they're all militants, insurgents. We need to crack down on the current situation with the addition of as many troops as it takes to finish the war.

Our low deployment of troops shows up as weakness on our part and makes our troops a turkey shoot for snipers and roadside bombs. These people understand only one thing ! Brute force! I have e-mailed the White House many times and sent similar e-mails as this, I know the President seems to be getting the message to let our guys fight the war and win instead of one arm behind their back and always apoligizing for mishaps.

We need fight to win and to hell with what the rest of the world thinks, we don't really have any allies except Israel, most of our so-called friends have turned into wimps and appeasers to the muslims. Our guys need our continual daily prayers and the Iraqi citizens, soldiers, police that really do want freedom from tyranny and I believe most of them do. They are the ancient Chaldean people from whom Abraham came out of, whom God called his friend, because he will teach his children about me. [Jehovah not Allah the moon god].

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (23) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
West can defeat radical Islam [219 words]C SmithDec 31, 2006 23:3171281
At the command of Saudia [117 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDDec 23, 2006 14:3370343
The Bush Response [188 words]Mitzi AlvinNov 24, 2006 15:2567197
Iraq [311 words]clarence puckettDec 18, 2006 23:5367197
stay from view [101 words]John ManittaNov 24, 2006 12:3967187
Uninhabited zones? [398 words]bdoranNov 24, 2006 11:4267175
No Islamists in the PA before Bush? Ha. [127 words]David P.Nov 1, 2006 09:4764985
An immodest proposal [66 words]Peter HerzOct 30, 2006 18:2664827
more right [172 words]dfwhiteNov 9, 2006 17:4764827
Bush Is Right [499 words]John ROct 29, 2006 19:1364765
Baathists - strategic partners [115 words]VijayOct 28, 2006 13:1464682
Vijay is absolutely correct [139 words]garyOct 28, 2006 16:3364682
Not necessarily Vijay [289 words]BobNov 2, 2006 09:0964682
Rationale for continuing Iraq war [164 words]VijayOct 27, 2006 09:1664610
Not a great idea [275 words]garyOct 26, 2006 22:1564587
The writing is on the wall! [318 words]nick4693Nov 11, 2006 19:3264587
Bush is on the right track [68 words]Rick HouseOct 26, 2006 20:2964578
Base of Operations? [136 words]Kevin MOct 26, 2006 15:3164560
But what would terrorists do if they had oil money? [52 words]J. SummersOct 26, 2006 11:5664548
It's the oil...! [103 words]S JainOct 26, 2006 11:5164547
oil Schmoil [35 words]PatrickOct 31, 2006 15:4364547
Horse feathers! [139 words]BillDec 27, 2006 00:4564547
You are wrong Bill [151 words]Gary AndersonMar 11, 2007 23:3464547

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Iraq by clarence puckett

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)