69 million page views

Consider the response to 1973 Arab oil embargo

Reader comment on item: America's Early Apologists for Islamism

Submitted by Dave (United States), Nov 20, 2019 at 12:18

The 1973 Arab oil embargo blindsided our leaders and introduced a new element into American life that had been hitherto ignored. Suddenly, an obscure and culturally backward clique of desert sheikhs were able to cripple our economy, delivering a slap in the face to our superpower arrogance. There were several consequences stemming from that trauma.

One response was constructive and realistic in involving an emphasis on energy conservation and a search for energy independence. Another response was an attempt to defuse the animosity that had led to the embargo by "solving" the Arab-Israeli conflict. I believe that it was this pie-in-the-sky effort that ultimately led to today's obscene examples of Islamist appeasement.

It started with expedience, in crisis mode, but the people tasked with tackling the problem (ex. Jimmy Carter) had very little understanding of Islam, Arab culture, or the history of the conflict, so they were prey to simplistic explanations and wishful thinking. Add to that an underlying psychological component of fear: fear of economic collapse, fear of public rage over gas lines and fear of Islamic terrorism. Helping to further distort reality were the notions of cultural relativism and anti-Western sentiment prevalent on the Left and in academia ever since the radicalization of the Vietnam war in the 1960s.

It was a toxic mix that has become even more toxic with time. While the threat of an oil embargo has faded, we are stuck, by mental inertia, with the same ignorant notions and wishful thinking, only now it has become a large and growing component of establishment thinking, kept alive by the media, academia and other institutions.

I used to get a lot of letters published in the NY Times, but never if I directly criticized Islamic ideology. Ignorance has become synonymous with tolerance among the elite and the chic.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (9) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
7Islam is Not just a religion [56 words]Michael Hanni Hanni MorcosNov 26, 2019 13:09256140
1Paradigmatic [53 words]MalcolmNov 22, 2019 14:46256091
5Winston Churchill and his prescient words on the subject [229 words]Charles MartelNov 21, 2019 18:49256078
1Ugh! [47 words]Dan SchnittkerNov 21, 2019 14:38256073
1Consider the response to 1973 Arab oil embargo [302 words]DaveNov 20, 2019 12:18256068
1Indeed: Our Ostrich Elite [222 words]KephaNov 23, 2019 15:29256068
1401, not 1400 [88 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David RyanNov 20, 2019 08:01256065
1Idealogy [21 words]Barry BlackNov 20, 2019 06:59256063
2Apologists in Congress and U.S. Military [246 words]Mike RamirezNov 19, 2019 19:41256051

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)