69 million page views

Response to Asim

Reader comment on item: Symposium: The Showdown [with Iran]

Submitted by No dhimmi (United States), Aug 8, 2005 at 00:34

Asim,

"You wonder why there are bombings in the West when people... advocate regime change and force countries to "engage in attrition".

What country (ies) is being forced into attrition by the West.....Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Jordan, Saudi Arabia? Iraq, yes, but wasn't Saddam's regime one of the "oppressive" type of regimes in the middle east that the Islamists talk about?

Does your objection apply to the Islamists who are trying to destabilize Iraq so they can impose their form of Islam? Does it apply to the Taliban?

"Thats why they hate the west- for the way they are treated. You harm them they will no doubt find ways of harming you."

If the West left the middle east and if the Palestinian-Isreali conflict was resolved, the bombings and other acts of terrorism would not cease. The real reason is restore Islam as a world force, the restoration of the Caliphate, world domination, and sharia as the only rule of law.

"The Iranians if treated like equals like they ought to be, would be no hinderance to the West."

Why should the US treat Iranians like equals when our Embassy staff was held hostage; US citizens held hostage in Beirut; death to America is a constant rant in demonstrations; and the new President says that Islam will rule every mountain.

In addition, it has consistently lied to the IAEC. It is styming negotiations with the Europeans on it's nuclear energy activties.

What reason does the United States have to trust the Iranian regime?

No Dhimmi
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
iranian situation [168 words]nick wrightAug 15, 2005 02:5624642
Iran already has nuclear weapons [357 words]Norm GrantAug 11, 2005 21:4624585
Response to Asim [250 words]No dhimmiAug 8, 2005 00:3424416
Further Comment [313 words]Peter J. HerzAug 7, 2005 01:4524404
Answer to Asim [389 words]WernerAug 3, 2005 22:2824322
Answer to Iran [176 words]Tony AAug 3, 2005 20:5724317
Monty islamists are after epople like you [108 words]Asim AhmedAug 3, 2005 19:2524312
no nuclear war -Iran already has bomb [259 words]haydarJan 8, 2006 21:4424312
Soft power [277 words]WernerAug 1, 2005 20:1224198
USA – playing for the mullahs! [127 words]John MAug 1, 2005 19:4724196
Soft-Power Works and Is Cost Effective [98 words]GWAug 1, 2005 15:3224187
Iranian Quagmire [88 words]John MAug 1, 2005 07:4624176
Disposition of the Military [78 words]MontyJul 31, 2005 11:3924152
Iran--stay out [249 words]Peter J. HerzJul 31, 2005 10:0824149
MAD makes sense [64 words]WJ HalversonJan 26, 2006 23:5524149
Shias & Sunnis [172 words]michael cJul 31, 2005 06:3524147
Which option [391 words]WernerJul 30, 2005 22:3124139
Israel's role? [109 words]Yehoshua ZellerJul 30, 2005 19:3124131

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)