Having read your and Martin Sherman's analysis....

Submitted by Scott (United States), May 20, 2017 at 04:40

I'm afraid I must agree with Dr. Sherman.

Daniel Pipes: : "To the contrary, the allure of a state after the conflict ends offers benefits to both sides. Israelis will be free of ruling unwanted subjects. Palestinians have a reason to behave."

The last sentence I believe shows ... not only the Palestinian narrative, but that of the Pan Arab World. To them, there is NO such thing as defeat, only Hudna - the temporary truce. ... this core issue is why I believe Dr. Sherman's sole but important critique of your position is a major flaw in your argument.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".