69 million page views

Covenant is selectively applied.

Reader comment on item: [London Terrorism:] British "Covenant of Security" with Islamists Ends

Submitted by Pat (United States), Jul 8, 2005 at 11:37

The Koranic notion of covenant of security: Muslims may not attack the inhabitants of a country where they live in safety.

So on what basis did Muslims attack the World Trade Center in 1993 and again in 2001? When have Muslims not been accorded safety in the US?
Why do Muslims continue to emigrate here if this is not a safe country in which to live? Some who left after 2001 eventually returned because they felt safer in the US than in Islamic countries. What does that say about the Muslim world?
Security is a two-way street. Muslims must accord others the same security and religious freedom they demand for themselves. I don't see that happening anywhere in the Muslim world.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)