69 million page views

Dangerous pragmatism

Reader comment on item: Jews Living in Palestine?

Submitted by Roar Sørensen (Sweden), Feb 7, 2014 at 04:01

Dr. Pipes!

I always read your articles with great interest, and love your clarity in most of the issues you discuss.

This article, however, I find problematic. I am sure you are aware of it, but maybe not all the readers are: The big difference between Netanyahu's and Bennet's approach is that the latter has accepted the idea of a two-state solution whereas the former has not. For this reason, the idea of Jews living under Palestinian rule becomes unacceptable for Bennet - as is the idea of Palestinian rule over the historic land of Israel at all, even without Jews living there. And personally, I think his solution of autonomy is worth considering.

Secondly, Netanyahu is being pragmatic - that is who he is, for good and for bad. But is it always beneficial for Israel? I would claim that the Jewish pragmatic attitude is one of the factors that has taken us from the Balfour declaration confirmed in San Remo and giving Jews all the territory they currently control plus the area of Jordan, and to the current situation where they are struggling to justify their claims to the heart of their historic homeland. Moreover, to the current state where the existence of the state within any borders is being questioned but on political and diplomatic grounds. Jabotinsky's article The Iron Wall, contains a lot of practical wisdom in this regard. But let me point out; I believe in the realistic but liberal approach that Jabotinsky represented; the Palestinian Arabs also have rights that need to be preserved (the matter of debate is if they include national rights).

Third, Jews are indeed living under the control of other people even in the Middle East so that is not a novelty - But to do so in Hebron, Bethel, and Shilo.... Was that really what Herzl meant when he talked about "the house that will shelter the Jewish nation"? True, you say that it will probably not happen for generations since the PA will not accept it - But what if, for tactical reasons, they did?

Finally, Netanyahu's tactic with this initiative is likely to postpone the establishment of a Palestinian state. But in doing so, he is also saying that Jews have no claims on Judea and Samaria - at least, that is how the world will understand it. However, a state's legitimacy is not only dependent on international resolutions and agreements, but also on a historic connection to the territory it controls. This is even more true internally, in order to build a love for the land among the people, and with this the will to defend it against enemies. If Israel can give away Judea and Samaria, why should they stick to Haifa, Netanya, Tel Aviv and Ashdod. Is this attitude a step towards the dismantling of the Zionist idea - even if unintended?
As you said, you often agree with Bennet's approach - for my part, I do so also this time.

With respect!
Roar Sørensen
Norway

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (41) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Close Settlement by Jews in Mandatory Palestine [412 words]RobertApr 5, 2016 01:00228713
4Genocide Against Jews in Palestine [138 words]LudvikusJul 1, 2014 19:00215699
4United Nations Political Affairs Cheif Jeffrey Feltman (an American) Expresses Prejudice Against Israel ? [357 words]LudvikusJun 24, 2014 08:37215578
5Judenrein, Pale of Settlement, and ethnic-cleansing - of Jews [302 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
LudvikusJun 8, 2014 09:55215295
1Decapitation is a bad cold remedy [99 words]DaveJun 6, 2014 19:15215277
5I'm certain it will manifest [23 words]Michael Hanni MorcosMar 10, 2014 02:04213691
Arab/Israel conflict [163 words]Nenette GrunbergMar 9, 2014 20:50213681
announce nothing do nothing [101 words]mythFeb 12, 2014 13:12213156
A Sensible Compromise [146 words]John W. McGinleyFeb 10, 2014 08:50213104
Israel allows no such thing [93 words]Amin RiazMar 20, 2014 22:16213104
2Charity starts at home and Allah is a Zionist [164 words]dhimmi no moreMar 23, 2014 12:04213104
.....if buraks could fly.... [131 words]Mohammed Wazir AhkspaidarMar 27, 2014 05:11213104
1Winged horses and the absurd [19 words]dhimmi no moreMar 30, 2014 11:47213104
4Putting Palestinians on the spot [167 words]BamagujeFeb 9, 2014 12:08213093
1A Poison Pill [85 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
NungmanFeb 28, 2014 01:43213093
5minorities are subject to extinction in Islamic countries [85 words]PrashantFeb 9, 2014 10:21213090
1Dangerous pragmatism [502 words]Roar SørensenFeb 7, 2014 04:01213036
1Liberal incomprehesion of the local realities and doubble standards [86 words]PermReaderFeb 8, 2014 07:29213036
1Amen, Mr. Pipes!! [37 words]kmanFeb 6, 2014 23:55213031
A whack job idea [71 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
NuritGFeb 6, 2014 22:56213030
1There is no "Palestine" - see Levant [201 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
George KeselmanFeb 6, 2014 19:41213025
Was this the dream of Herzl and Jabotinsky? [14 words]Anatoly TsaliovichFeb 9, 2014 03:17213025
HOW DOES THE WORLD READ THIS [36 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
John TrainFeb 6, 2014 15:44213020
HOW DOES THE WORLD READ THIS....CONTINUED [20 words]JOHN TRAIFeb 6, 2014 21:55213020
"Jews in Palestine?" [169 words]JudithFeb 6, 2014 14:43213017
thank you for bringing attention to this issue and I agree fully with your last statement. [80 words]EricFeb 6, 2014 14:13213016
1The 20% diplomatic master stroke [92 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Clemens Heni, PhDFeb 6, 2014 13:16213015
1So... [152 words]josef zuaresFeb 10, 2014 14:44213015
It's a Matter of Trust [144 words]Laurence TauberFeb 6, 2014 12:35213012
Is it feasible? [58 words]Patrick SloanFeb 6, 2014 12:24213011
1Earning trust [46 words]David W. LincolnFeb 6, 2014 12:22213010
Islamism [94 words]zchugFeb 6, 2014 12:03213009
3Jews under Palestinian Control means No More Jews. [213 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
GamalielFeb 6, 2014 11:59213007
Great point [66 words]LawrieFeb 6, 2014 11:58213006
Dr. Pipes supports Netanyahu over Bennett. Why? [115 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Steve KleinFeb 6, 2014 11:31213004
Haredi Jews can get what they want -- Here's How [72 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mark WerfelFeb 6, 2014 11:30213003
1I took this position for the gaza withdrawal, but the counterargument was [49 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MarkFeb 6, 2014 11:17213002
2Bluff effective. Your move. [99 words]Duane GainsburgFeb 6, 2014 11:17213001
2Unbelievable text from Daniel Pipes (!!!) I am shocked ! [383 words]A'hare KodemFeb 10, 2014 10:13213001
2Will Israelis Be Subject to Palestinian Sharia Laws? [130 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mike RamirezFeb 6, 2014 11:13213000
Palestine = Israel = One Jewish State is only solution [76 words]Michael SJul 4, 2014 04:44213000

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)