69 million page views

A message from England

Reader comment on item: Viscount Samuel, Meet Secretary Hagel

Submitted by Antony (United Kingdom), Apr 25, 2013 at 03:24

Is it not time that we stopped being so politically correct about the over-sized Muslim community that has come to our country. The British people have never been asked whether they want an influx of Asian people. How is it possible in a democratic country like UK, that a Prime Minister like Blair can allow an influx of several million Muslims into our once magical country to try an experiment – he has never squared with the British Public called "Multiculturalism". There is sadly no recourse. The impact on this country is huge – the burden on our hospitals, transport and schools systems renders them near to breaking point. The legal system and welfare state is also something they take for granted.

How can 1.8 billion Muslims believe and practice this primitive and barbaric creed 5 times a day by praying to Mecca?.

These strange people who worship a "Prophet" who clearly did not exist as a prophet and who use a book of worship that was written 260 years after the so said "Prophet" died – so patently a fabricated text. Is it not time to get some reality here? Islam is 600 years younger than Christianity so in many ways it is like us living in the time of Elizabeth 1 and not 2.

Many of these primitive peoples, who have been allowed to settle in our country, make no effort to assimilate into our community with regards to language, dress and customs. In many Muslim countries the girls are not encouraged to be educated – they often have to suffer the appalling indignity of Female Genital Mutilation and the women "have to be ready for sex when their men when they come back" it is expected of them. It is very common in countries like Pakistan for daughters to be betrothed to uncles or first cousins at a very early age - which is as we know genetically very dangerous and totally illegal in this country. Our poor NHS has to pick up all the pieces to these mangled wrecks of humanity.

The very fact that Muslim men who die for Jihad are supposed to go straight to heaven and have the "use" of 40 virgins! Why are Virgins so important to the Muslims – what primitive clock is working here. Is sex a prize for martyrdom?

These beliefs are set to control women as the men do not understand them. So lock the women up – do not educate them – cut their genitalia – clothe them in black rags and make them walk 5 steps behind a man. It is truly shameful.

So why do we continue to permit this to go on in our country and give these people the right to come and live her and bring their primitive beliefs – laws and customs with them. We also surely cannot have an innocent 12 year old child being forced to marry a 60 year old pederast with 3 wives already….this is monstrous and it is time that this practice is outlawed in this country for once and for all. We can not have one set of rules for the indigenous population and one for the immigrants.

Tony Blair has a lot to answer for.

Surely if these people want to live here they have to adhere to our laws and customs…. so no Sharia law – no marriage to 1st cousins – the girls have to be over 18 and agree without coercion to the marriage – you can only have 1 wife – the law of the land is British law. We should also adopt the French secular law banning Burquas or the Niqabs this has nothing to do with religion but enslavement.

The fundamental point for UK is the cost of monitoring the more radicalised members of this community. There are several thousand of these British nationals fighting alongside militant Islamists in Syria – Mali – Nigeria – Somalia – Libya & Tunisia. Like the Boston bombers they import their plans to blow up people, buildings and infrastructure as they do not like what UK does in countries like Afghanistan and Iraq. So they try and have a negative effect on our Foreign policy by frightening us.

These people cost the country millions of pounds a year. The Security services are working round the clock to keep us safe. Why should the British tax payer have to foot the bill for this and it is the same for all western countries. So, the question is why do we welcome these people into our country? The argument can be made that as there are some dangerous Muslims here - there are also many peaceful Muslims here…………..is this a reason to allow them to come and live here. I believe that if you asked the people of this Island, in a referendum, if they support an Immigration policy to increase the number of Muslims, you would get a resounding NO.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to A message from England by Antony

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)