69 million page views

quite simple

Reader comment on item: Why Newt Gingrich Was Right about Palestinian History
in response to reader comment: Laying out an argument

Submitted by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan (Australia), Dec 22, 2011 at 19:01

Mr Amin Riaz , without responding to the long list of facts offered by other bloggers asks:

"What is this evidence - what is it for?"

To me it was perfectly clear it was in response to the question he posed in the preceding post '...."Other..... any historical evidence besides the Bible?"'

To go on and then ask: 'What are you aiming at. What are you claiming this evidence shows?Without stating that - what am I meant to do? Guess or draw my own conclusions? ' is facetious.

Any reasonably minded person should be able to figure it out.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)