69 million page views

PMU reactionary?

Reader comment on item: [The Boim Trial:] Exploiting the Koran to Terrorize

Submitted by Bujevac (Malaysia), Dec 16, 2004 at 21:25

Dr. Pipes,

This is the second time you have indicated that you consider the PMU a rectionary organization. However, you have offered no proof of this statement. Even a cursory review of their website indicates that PMU voices some of the most revolutionary/unorthodox and anti-wahabbi views in the Muslim world. Many of the authors have espoused similair views to yours on matters of Islamic reform and terrorism. Your disagreement seems to be that they are so called leftist (whatever that might mean) and you judge them accordingly. It is time to move beyond labels and let's look at the substance.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

I provide the case against the PMU at http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/361.


Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)