69 million page views

And The Winner is ??????

Reader comment on item: Anoush Ehteshami and Democracy in Egypt

Submitted by Jay1 (United States), Feb 11, 2011 at 23:01

Dr Pipes is absolutely right to suggest that Egypt will struggle toward democracy and indeed may fall short of the mark. Because It is not clear what the demonstrators are seeking, (save a voice) it is here, where the picture gets murky.With an unclear stated political request,a population can often be vulnerable to the master of the microphone. So who might this master be that one might be concerned with? It could be a dangerous religious group, Iran style, that will save the people through a warped sense of heaven.Or it could be a handsome leader of all the Arab world, with a renewed warped sense of history. This is what to watch out for, if democracy in Egypt falls short .

While its too early to tell, the Muslim Brotherhood seems the leading candidate on the warped heaven side. My prediction for a leading handsome candidate, who will mention Israel at least once a week, with a warped sense of history, is........................................Amr Moussa.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)