69 million page views

NO CHANGES BY YOUR COMMENTS.

Reader comment on item: "An Arabist's Guide to Egyptian Colloquial" Now Online
in response to reader comment: Our dear iam and the Qur'an

Submitted by IamJoseph (Australia), May 3, 2010 at 20:24

>For the readers: You will notice that our dear iam the demagogue just did not address the most important part of my post and that is the Quranic evidence (eg: al-ayka or layka) we have in the text about other texts that pre-date the Qur'an by hundreds of years and these texts do not exist because they could have been destroyed or they are in a cave waiting to be discovered

And this was our dear iam's answer

># The Quran does not impact here at all -

Hello: The Qur'an is an Arabic language text that has a history too! and I can assure you that it did not drop from the sky and how many times do I have to tell you that?

-------------------------------

# If the Quran contains pre-existing material, it is hardly proof this came from the Quran. E.g. The Quran contains descriptions of Abraham - this info is not available any place outside the Hebrew bible. You cannot say that one day in the future, that which is now contained in the Quran will be found - come back when it is found. Nor can you call me a demagogue here - we are pursueing truth and accuracy, and the whole world knows that Muslims parade 1000's of falsehoods openly [Blood Libels, Protocols, Jewish temple is a myth, etc] - and not a single Muslim stands up to negate these falsehoods. I am not a demagogue here.

-------------------------------------------------

And did you think for a minute how can the Arabs that did not have any literary tradition have a book like the Qur'an composed as we are told just like that?

The answer to this: Muslims tell us that the Qur'an dropped from the sky. So did the Qur'an drop from the sky?

# No, it did not drop from the sky - it was taken from pre-existing material. Here, revelation or magic cannot apply, because that signifies something new - not what is already pre-existing. E.g. Christians follows the Hebrew bible - where do you think they got it from - the sky?

-------------------------------------------------------

Logic as well as texual criticism of the Qur'an reveal that the Qur'an is really a mish mash of older texts (eg: the Bible, the secular literature of the Syrians and the Greeks and the Jewish tradition or al-Isra'iliyat and it is even difficult at times to define what is really Arabic in the Qur'an) nontheless we have it written IN ARABIC or in Garshouni (and for this see: Q72:18 where the word ALMSJD was read by the ulama as masaajid and it must be from Syriac mesgod and in Q72:19 there is no Arabic word called LBDA and it must be the Syriac 3abada as the letter lam and 3ayn in Syriac can be misread and for this see Luxenberg) or oral texts and in the case of al-ayak layka it must have been several hundreds of years and some of it could be from al-shi3r al-jahili (and for this see Surat al-Nijm) and yes much of al-shi3r al-jahili was made up in the 2nd and 3rd centuries of islam during the Muslim masora) nonetheless these were oral texts

# There is no logic in that statement. Pre-dating writing styles does not prove your case. Being so recent as the 6th Century, there is blatant logic this would be taken from the Hebrew or Christian bible.

------------------------------------

And here is another example: in the case of let us say the story of ahl al-kahf (The Seven Sleepers of Ephesus) it must have been 100 years prior to the date of Muhammad's mab3ath in 610CE as the story was written by a Syrian in Syriac who died about 515CE and more evidence that the ulama were dealing with a text and in this case the case the word al-raqeem (the name of the dog) that it must have been a misreading of the Syriac name of the Emperor Decuis which in Syriac would be DQS (DiQiS) and in this case there was a disconnect between the text of the story that must have been in Garshouni and the time the Qur'an was canonized and by then the Ulama had no clue what the word DQS really meansLet me guess: You did not get it right?

# This is absurd. If a document already exists 100 years pre-Quran, it proves my point: it is pre-existing material and cannot be allocated to the Quran.

---------------------------------------------------------

>it was written around 600 CE.

This is what Muslims tell us but the Islamic Historical Tradition is the biggest literary fraud in the history of mankind

# ? I've no idea what you refer to. What part is the fraud?

--------------------------------------------------------------------

>If something in it is claimed as pre-dating the Quran, and you claim it is subject to a yet to be discovered relic, then you should wait till that discovery occurs.

No you do not get it. History is never black and white it is grey except in the mind of dogmatic people lile you and argument from silence is a poor argument now do you get it?

But you know what? The islamic tradition tells us that Uthman the 3rd khalifa and the one that is credited for the copy of the Qur'an that we have now (Mushaf Uthman or the codex of Uthman) DESTROYED all copies of the "variant readings" of the Qur'an so how do we know that he did not destory the written literary sources of the Qu'ran and we will never know and some of such sources could be hiding in some cave waiting to be discovred just like the Qurman library or waiting in a clay jar like the Nag Hammadi library now do you get it mr dogma?

# This also is not a logical premise. There is no reason an original, contemporary copy does not exist - other than it was changed and the original destroyed. In any case, this has no relevence in showing the material was new - in both cases we see no new, original material.

----------------------------------------------------

>It is hardly a proof now that Arabic writings predate 400 CE or thereabout.

Hypocrite

But you told us that it 300CE too right? So what changed? or is it ya3ni bel taqrib

# No changes any place from my original premise. 328 CE and 400 CE is the same time span of 70 years, given also that your reference does not even contain words ARAB, etc. My point is even if we consider the 328 CE item as connected to the Quran, it is too close to 400 CE and you have no imprints of Arabic in between or earlier than 300 CE. No hypocrisy here, just facts before us.

----------------------------------------

We had no proof of King david till the Tel Dan find - why is there no proof from you till now, when the Arabs were not exiled and their lands not plundered as of the Jews?

You are not very focused are you?

>This says that even in the future we cannot expect the proof you wait for.

No you do not as this is what the study of history is all about

And if we are to follow his bogus logic then I can see his likes telling the world prior to the discovery of let us say The Gospel of Thomas (which historians knew that is existed but there was no copy) in the mid 1940's; There is no such thing as the Gospel of Thomas but we have it extant in Coptic. And as for the argument from silence" god forbid as he has no clue what it really means

># The Gospels does not impact here.

Hello: this is what argument from silence is all about!

Also notice that this thread is about what is really Egyptian Arabic? And is it a language or a dialect? You will not hear a logical answer from him. Mr ignorant I study history You? you are a demagogue now do you get it?

># Then please show some historical proof of any Arabic writings pre-400 CE like a historican should - without deflecting to EA.

What does this date of 400CE have to do with EA?

> Note that the Hebrew and Greek do not have to look at Egyptian hybrids common to many other Arabian writings, so why do you?

Why do I what?

> If there is no evidence of an Arab race pre-500 BCE -

And what does this have to do with EA?

>how can there be Arabic writings or Egyptian-Arab writings before this time? There is no evidence, which is why you deflect and won't

Hello: EA starting point was 642CE the year of the Arab invasion of Egypt like it or not

Go and tell them at Hebrew University which has one of the best Arabic language and islamic studies centers in the whole world about your little cockamamie theories and they will laugh at you I promise you

------------------------------------------------------

Your reponses are not logical at all - you just repeat the same things even after responding to them numerously. The fact remains there is no proof of Arabs pre-500 BCE and no Arabic writings pre-300-400 CE. You should have 1000's of proof. There is no proof the pre-Islamic arabs ever followed the Abrahamic or Mosaic belief - there is proof of the reverse being the case: so how can Jews be infidels when thet did follow the Abrahamic and Mosaic Monotheism and the Arabs did not? You have no Arab kings, queens, wars, cities, monuments or relics pre-500 BCE, and no books, scrolls, etchings, papyrus, etc pre-300 CE. The artificial and manipulated connections inferred with pre-dating references are all bogus - with no hard proof of it - and no transitory imprints of it any place.

I res my case till you come up with some real hard proof. The debate has become circular because of your denials.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (191) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
re: Arabic vernacular [97 words]LUANNE M ASHEFeb 12, 2017 08:29236657
2The debate in Egypt now is about not just al-hijab and al-niqab but also what is really the language of Egypt [452 words]dhimmi no moreAug 29, 2010 09:20177419
1The mantra of many young people in Egypt now is: "i"m Egyptian not Arab" [195 words]dhimmi no moreJul 12, 2010 19:07175474
Arabic language threatened in it's homeland [713 words]VijayJun 16, 2010 07:24174457
Muhammedian affinity [94 words]DONVANFeb 10, 2010 10:38168755
From quran [99 words]skalMar 30, 2010 16:12168755
Blissful Political Correction [342 words]ArlindaJan 12, 2010 19:15167255
Diglossia [96 words]VijayJan 3, 2010 08:49166768
Egyptian Arabic is it a case of diglossia or it is a unique language and the ligua sacra [504 words]dhimmi no moreJan 6, 2010 12:10166768
Egyptian Arabic [266 words]VijayJan 7, 2010 18:37166768
3More about Egyptian Arabic [1013 words]dhimmi no moreJan 9, 2010 09:07166768
EGYPT WAS NOT ARAB; ARABIC IS A NEW LANGUAGE. [150 words]IamJosephApr 6, 2010 03:17166768
Vijay: The fundamental things apply. [295 words]IamJosephApr 6, 2010 19:57166768
ALLAH DID NOT REGARD THE PHARAOHS EVIL - THE TORAH DID. [159 words]IamJosephApr 6, 2010 20:09166768
DIGLOSSIA THEME IS A FAKE HERE. [454 words]IamJosephApr 8, 2010 20:43166768
Yes the Copts are persecuted in Egypt and it is a fact [262 words]dhimmi no moreApr 9, 2010 19:07166768
Our dear Jospeh needs to take a deep breath [306 words]dhimmi no moreApr 9, 2010 19:18166768
Diglossia and our dear Jospeh [163 words]dhimmi no moreApr 9, 2010 19:29166768
NO ARAB RACE PRE-500 BCE. [571 words]IamJosephApr 10, 2010 19:51166768
THE POINT! [305 words]IamJosephApr 10, 2010 20:11166768
GOBBLEDYGOOK, NOT! [568 words]IamJosephApr 10, 2010 21:55166768
Our Dear Iam who is not very focused [909 words]dhimmi no moreApr 12, 2010 07:42166768
Point? What point? [440 words]dhimmi no moreApr 12, 2010 18:12166768
Our Dear Iam part deux [855 words]dhimmi no moreApr 12, 2010 18:45166768
Gem time and our dear Joseph [130 words]dhimmi no moreApr 12, 2010 19:07166768
Focused response to yah habibi. [1473 words]IamJosephApr 12, 2010 20:48166768
MOSES WAS THE FIRST ZIONIST. [634 words]IamJosephApr 12, 2010 21:08166768
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [544 words]IamJoseph'Apr 14, 2010 05:54166768
It is ya and not your bogus yah [1956 words]dhimmi no moreApr 14, 2010 18:04166768
RE: gobbeldygook [1619 words]IamJosephApr 15, 2010 20:13166768
And the comedy goes on and on [2049 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2010 07:57166768
Ya habibi: Is EA a lugha or a lahja? [640 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2010 08:14166768
The Arabs in antiquity and more references that attest to the existence of the Arabs from the 9th century BCE [406 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2010 10:14166768
Four for the price of one: Arabs and their language, their kings, Syro-Arabic all in one in the namara inscription [275 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2010 14:35166768
THE SAME NONSENSE REPEATED HERE. [454 words]IamJosephApr 19, 2010 01:36166768
THESE REFERENCES HAVE NO RELATION TO ARABS. [633 words]IamJosephApr 19, 2010 02:15166768
THERE IS NO READING ISSUE HERE - JUST A LACK OF PROOF. [35 words]IamJosephApr 19, 2010 02:19166768
NO ARAB RACE PRE-500 BCE. [539 words]IamJosephApr 19, 2010 02:42166768
Four for the price of one: Arabs and their language, their kings, Syro-Arabic all in one in the namara inscription part deux [620 words]dhimmi no moreApr 20, 2010 07:19166768
Ya habibi: Is EA a lugha or a lahja? part deux [119 words]dhimmi no moreApr 20, 2010 07:26166768
Cherry picking time and our dear iam and EA [959 words]dhimmi no moreApr 20, 2010 18:51166768
NO EVDENCE MEANS ITS A FICTION. [286 words]IamJosephApr 20, 2010 21:19166768
The Arabs and their language and our dear iam [78 words]dhimmi no moreApr 22, 2010 06:25166768
Four for the price of one: Arabs and their language, their kings, Syro-Arabic all in one in the namara inscription part trois [758 words]dhimmi no moreApr 22, 2010 06:41166768
NO EVIDENCES PRODUCED HERE. [1051 words]IamJosephApr 22, 2010 21:07166768
RE DISHONESTY. [158 words]IamJosephApr 22, 2010 21:17166768
MANIPULATING HSTORY. [671 words]IamJosephApr 23, 2010 00:17166768
RESPONDING TO ALL YOUR UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS: [949 words]IamJosephApr 23, 2010 21:50166768
And more ignorance [486 words]dhimmi no moreApr 24, 2010 06:24166768
Cherry picking time and our dear iam [75 words]dhimmi no moreApr 24, 2010 06:58166768
Our dear iam and some of the Quranic material pre-dates Muhammad by hundreds of years and "argument from silence" [1597 words]dhimmi no moreApr 24, 2010 09:39166768
Egypt should pay us Jews backpay for building the fa cochta Pyramids! [47 words]Benny zeeApr 25, 2010 14:30166768
ARAB & ARABIAN ARE NOT EQUAL. [217 words]IamJosephApr 25, 2010 22:09166768
TRUTHFULNESS IS GREATER THAN TRUTH. [1358 words]IamJosephApr 25, 2010 22:45166768
Our dear iam and the word ghalabawi [311 words]dhimmi no moreApr 27, 2010 06:44166768
Our dear iam and "argument from silence" [1778 words]dhimmi no moreApr 27, 2010 07:27166768
NO PROOF BY THIS POSTER IN ANY F HIS CLAIMS. [403 words]IamJosephApr 28, 2010 05:47166768
INCULCATED DENIAL IS SEEN THROUGHOUT THIS DEBATE. [636 words]IamJosephApr 28, 2010 21:38166768
Our dear iam and more comedy [1044 words]dhimmi no moreMay 1, 2010 06:56166768
NO PROOF ANYWHERE IN YOUR POSTS. [1005 words]IamJosephMay 1, 2010 23:31166768
Our dear iam and the Qur'an [1122 words]dhimmi no moreMay 2, 2010 09:17166768
NO CHANGES BY YOUR COMMENTS. [1661 words]IamJosephMay 3, 2010 20:24166768
At last our dear iam is discovering the Periplus but did he read it? that is a different! and he also discovered the Arabs that lived in the Syrian desert and! [1242 words]dhimmi no moreMay 4, 2010 07:12166768
It seems that at last our dear iam gets it [2214 words]dhimmi no moreMay 4, 2010 17:54166768
EGYPT WAS NOT ARAB. [339 words]IamJoseohMay 4, 2010 22:46166768
More delusions [996 words]dhimmi no moreMay 5, 2010 06:47166768
Coptic is an alpahebt and Egytpian is a langauge [62 words]dhimmi no moreMay 5, 2010 18:31166768
THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS. [2453 words]IamJosephMay 5, 2010 20:55166768
BIG FONTS - BIG DENIALS. [332 words]IamJosephMay 6, 2010 20:26166768
The language is called Egyptian or metremnkemi and the abgad is Greek with 6 more consonants [449 words]dhimmi no moreMay 7, 2010 18:26166768
NO PROOFS WHATSOEVER HERE. [1420 words]IamJosephMay 7, 2010 22:03166768
THERE IS NO FRAUD IN THE HEBREW WRITINGS. [1577 words]IamJosephMay 7, 2010 23:00166768
Egypt and its languages 101 and this is as basic as it can be [381 words]dhimmi no moreMay 8, 2010 10:36166768
DENIALS WITH NO ADMISSION OF THE FACTS. [683 words]IamJosephMay 8, 2010 22:48166768
The Arabs as people [152 words]dhimmi no moreMay 9, 2010 06:32166768
Arabs in the literary sources before 500BCE [73 words]dhimmi no moreMay 9, 2010 07:06166768
The Diglossia Desperation to hype a total forgery. [358 words]IamJosephMay 11, 2010 02:58166768
YOU ARE GRASPING AT FALSE PREMISES. [580 words]IamJosephMay 11, 2010 03:28166768
NO 'ARAB' - ONLY 'ARABIAN' [262 words]IamJosephMay 11, 2010 07:35166768
More comedy [264 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 06:47166768
ARAB & ARABIAN ARE NOT EQUAL. [484 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 22:00166768
Why we Egyptians do not speak Arabic [93 words]Ahmed EgyptianMay 24, 2010 11:22166768
The language of Egypt [203 words]dhimmi no moreMay 25, 2010 18:20166768
Dr. Pipes statements [378 words]YnnatchkahJan 3, 2010 03:00166756
5Great Topic: Egyptian Arabic is a lugha and not a lahga or even lugha 3amiyya [696 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dhimmi no moreJan 2, 2010 09:44166717
THERE WAS NEVER AN EGYPTIAN ARABIC PRE-500 BCE. [162 words]IamJosephApr 10, 2010 22:09166717
More gems from our dear iamjoseph [203 words]dhimmi no moreApr 12, 2010 18:51166717
Our dear Iamjospeh and more comedy [383 words]dhimmi no moreApr 14, 2010 08:06166717
No Gobbledygook [135 words]IamJosephApr 15, 2010 20:20166717
Yes gobbledygook [243 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2010 08:06166717
No Gobbledygook [126 words]IamJosephApr 19, 2010 02:25166717
Oh yeah real gobbledygook and ano chi is Arabic ana hay! gasp!!! [216 words]dhimmi no moreApr 20, 2010 19:05166717
NO PROOF BY THIS POSTER IN ANY F HIS CLAIMS. [147 words]IamJosephApr 20, 2010 21:27166717
Hebrew and Arabic and Syriac have much in common but nothing in common with the language of Egypt [179 words]dhimmi no moreApr 24, 2010 06:32166717
1JEWS NEVER STEAL LANDS. [458 words]IamJosephApr 24, 2010 21:20166717
AnoChi and the language of Egypt and anok pe or ang pe [767 words]dhimmi no moreApr 26, 2010 07:36166717
ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD. [731 words]IamJosephApr 26, 2010 23:26166717
More delusions [1282 words]dhimmi no moreApr 28, 2010 07:38166717
DENIAL OF HISTORY. [1394 words]IamJosephApr 28, 2010 20:35166717
The Greeks invaded Arabia? Really? Hint: Egypt ain't Arabia [149 words]dhimmi no moreMay 1, 2010 07:11166717
Our dear iam is pontificating about not just one language but several languages that he are clueless about [721 words]dhimmi no moreMay 1, 2010 07:31166717
The 'En Avadat aka 'En Abadat's Arabic language inscription dated 88 to 150CE [451 words]dhimmi no moreMay 1, 2010 11:56166717
our dear iam al-munafiq al-kabeer and his so called experts [617 words]dhimmi no moreMay 1, 2010 15:16166717
THERE IS NO PROOF WHEN THEY SHOULD BE 1000's OF PROOF. [1666 words]IamJoseph'May 1, 2010 21:42166717
NO PROOF CONTINUES. [507 words]IamJosephMay 1, 2010 23:49166717
This time our dear iam does not seem to realize that history is never black and white [450 words]dhimmi no moreMay 2, 2010 12:41166717
Arabic inscriptions revisited [126 words]dhimmi no moreMay 4, 2010 08:12166717
BANKRUPTCY OF PROOF IS NOW BLATANT. [824 words]IamJosephMay 4, 2010 22:35166717
YOUR OWN SOURCES PROVE YOU WRONG. [363 words]IamJosephMay 4, 2010 23:01166717
More delusions [14 words]dhimmi no moreMay 5, 2010 18:23166717
More ignorance and more comedy [80 words]dhimmi no moreMay 5, 2010 18:38166717
Arabic inscriptions revisited and our dear iam' and more comedy [984 words]dhimmi no moreMay 6, 2010 06:47166717
Books and History. [222 words]IamJosephMay 6, 2010 20:37166717
Fase connections are not proofs. [1992 words]IAMjosephMay 6, 2010 21:39166717
CLECK MATE AGAIN. [226 words]IamJosephMay 6, 2010 21:54166717
1More from our dear iam [147 words]dhimmi no moreMay 7, 2010 17:59166717
Gem time [159 words]dhimmi no moreMay 7, 2010 18:07166717
REASONINGS WITHOUT ANY MERITS. [524 words]IamJosephMay 7, 2010 21:29166717
RE, PALESTINE AND COPTICS. [263 words]IamJoseohMay 7, 2010 22:18166717
our dear iam [71 words]dhimmi no moreMay 8, 2010 07:05166717
Coptic and Egyptian [1234 words]dhimmi no moreMay 8, 2010 07:51166717
EGYPT AND PALESTINE WERE INVADED BY ARABS [210 words]IamJoseohMay 8, 2010 22:26166717
Our dear iam and baby steps [326 words]dhimmi no moreMay 9, 2010 06:50166717
Arabs in the literary sources before 500BCE part deux [122 words]dhimmi no moreMay 9, 2010 07:17166717
This time three for the price of one [182 words]dhimmi no moreMay 10, 2010 07:01166717
ALL YOUR SUBMISSIONS ARE USELESS. [416 words]IamJosehMay 11, 2010 03:16166717
ANOTHER FCTICIOUS NAME. [329 words]IamJosehMay 11, 2010 03:42166717
THE HEBREW BIBLE PROVES THE REVERSE. [520 words]IamJosephMay 11, 2010 06:43166717
And speaking of "greasy" [60 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 06:35166717
Let me repeat it one more time [96 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 06:52166717
I read this as you have no answer [238 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 06:55166717
Much more comedy [341 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 07:05166717
And speaking of the Negev [139 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 07:20166717
LOGICAL HISTORY DISPROVES YOU. [517 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 21:48166717
ARAB & ARABIAN ARE NOT EQUAL. [212 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 22:10166717
ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD. [198 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 22:38166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [401 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 22:43166717
ALL YOUR SUBMISSIONS ARE USELESS. [304 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 23:17166717
The word for today is bizarre and more evidence from 'En 'Avdot [513 words]dhimmi no moreMay 13, 2010 07:12166717
The Greeks are coming.... the Greeks are coming.... for the readers read and laugh [321 words]dhimmi no moreMay 13, 2010 07:46166717
ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD. [679 words]IamJosephMay 13, 2010 22:44166717
ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD. [891 words]IamJosephMay 13, 2010 23:12166717
Egypt was in Arabia? Really? [39 words]dhimmi no moreMay 14, 2010 06:26166717
Our dear iam has nothing to say [131 words]dhimmi no moreMay 14, 2010 06:34166717
More delusions from our dear iam part trois [277 words]dhimmi no moreMay 14, 2010 06:43166717
Arabs in the literary sources and the Arabic language [805 words]dhimmi no moreMay 14, 2010 07:13166717
Incorrect deflection. [214 words]IamJosephMay 14, 2010 22:24166717
ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD. [1205 words]IamJosephMay 14, 2010 23:03166717
NO ARAB RACE PRE-500 BCE. [607 words]IamJosephMay 14, 2010 23:16166717
The mother of all gems revisited [1221 words]dhimmi no moreMay 15, 2010 07:38166717
More from 'En Avdot inscription [110 words]dhimmi no moreMay 15, 2010 07:48166717
So when did Egypt move out of Arabia to its present location in Africa? [199 words]dhimmi no moreMay 15, 2010 11:42166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [437 words]IamJosephMay 16, 2010 21:25166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [632 words]IamJosephMay 17, 2010 20:01166717
The Islamic concept of al-jahiliyya and our dear iam and it seems that Arabic became a real language as back as 1500BCE [908 words]dhimmi no moreMay 18, 2010 07:57166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [1652 words]IamJosephMay 18, 2010 20:03166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [931 words]IamJosephMay 19, 2010 20:20166717
Reading the Qur'an [506 words]dhimmi no moreMay 22, 2010 08:37166717
More nonsense from our dear iam [435 words]dhimmi no moreMay 22, 2010 12:01166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [1222 words]IamJosephMay 23, 2010 22:43166717
Hebrew writings are authentic and contemporary. [100 words]IamJosephMay 23, 2010 22:51166717
The letter V in Egyptian/Coptic [50 words]dhimmi no moreMay 25, 2010 18:07166717
BOGUS PROOF OF HISTORY. [212 words]IamJosephMay 27, 2010 03:35166717
2HUMANITY HAS BEEN FOOLED BY A FALSIFIED HISTORY. [951 words]IamJosephMay 27, 2010 21:07166717
1The second letter in the Coptic alphabet is Beta also Veta [538 words]dhimmi no moreJun 1, 2010 18:41166717
ANOTHER BLUNDER EXPOSED. [384 words]IamJosephJun 2, 2010 20:28166717
LETTER 'V' WAS INTRODUCED BY THE HEBREW WRITINGS. [184 words]IamJosephJun 2, 2010 20:41166717
More drivel [220 words]dhimmi no moreJun 4, 2010 18:28166717
Our dear iam the letter V in the language of Egypt and those pesky Copts and the long version [1165 words]dhimmi no moreJun 5, 2010 15:35166717
BOGUS MANIPULATIONS ARE NOT PROOFS. [394 words]IamJosephJun 5, 2010 19:30166717
More ignorance [1568 words]dhimmi no moreJun 6, 2010 08:33166717
THERE IS NOTHING SACRED ABOUT FALSEHOODS. [1911 words]IamJosephJun 7, 2010 22:39166717
MORE ERRORS REPEATED. [961 words]IamJosephJun 9, 2010 00:31166717
More drivel and the saga goes on and on [181 words]dhimmi no moreJun 9, 2010 05:55166717
The pesky Copts again and the letter B and V and F [175 words]dhimmi no moreJun 9, 2010 18:02166717
WRONG AGAIN. [232 words]IamJosephJun 9, 2010 19:17166717
and who really created Allah [70 words]dhimmi no moreJun 11, 2010 18:25166717
THE FALSEHOODS OF MUSLIMS. [370 words]IamJosephJun 11, 2010 20:45166717
The Aristotelian problem and the so called tawheed [54 words]dhimmi no moreJun 14, 2010 06:24166717
DID ISLAM CREATE JERUSALEM - OR COMMIT ROBBERY AND DENIAL? [250 words]IamJosephJun 14, 2010 23:28166717
Who really created the creator? [13 words]dhimmi no moreJun 17, 2010 06:10166717
ISLAM WILL COLLAPSE UNLESS THE BALFOUR IS RESTORED. [299 words]IamJosephJun 17, 2010 21:58166717
You still did not answer [115 words]dhimmi no moreJun 20, 2010 06:49166717
4Old civilizations and their languages are not conjured away and Beer-root aka Beirut [1033 words]dhimmi no moreJun 19, 2011 07:52166717
The word ANOCHI [80 words]Victor HakimDec 18, 2014 13:46166717
1Syriac and Lebanese/Syrian Arabic [11 words]dhimmi no moreDec 20, 2015 12:29166717
Egyptian colloquial Arabic [48 words]Arthur GoldschmidtDec 31, 2009 21:39166643
Thank you very much [21 words]Anne-Marie DelcambreDec 31, 2009 11:46166623
Thank You [36 words]Becky KivakDec 30, 2009 19:45166585
ironic juxtaposition [21 words]philipDec 30, 2009 13:14166562
Thank you for the grammar! [33 words]Michael TownsDec 30, 2009 10:51166550

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to NO CHANGES BY YOUR COMMENTS. by IamJoseph

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)