The Origins of islam:-

Submitted by gordon weare (New Zealand), Sep 24, 2009 at 18:30

The deadly islamic psyche is first mentioned in Genesis Chp 16 and verse 12, then the Torah or Old Testament educates us further. (With the current pc-ideology thats causing the Breakup of the 20th Century with its mounting stresses on traditional Authority, we are losing sight of these lessons). Now the Torah, Old Testament reveals the mentality and the cowardly tactics in Amalek and Haman (Now don't that run close to Arafat and Hamas ? ). READ UP, Investigate these, and see for yourself, and you'll see the same cowardly, deadly tactics. Note: Amalek and Haman were destroyed.. as ALL of islam will also be. One of the greatest (and least expected) international troublemakers, who play a role in the Mid-East conflicts is Englands BBC. Orla Guerin is sewing the seeds of pc in other parts of the world now, but another Englishman is now broadcasting anti-Israeli bias - and from Israel itself ! I am amazed they get away with it, and are not deported. This from the UK's Daily Mail:- Another exposure of where the 'Licence Fee' goes - to Hamas, from the BBC. "The BBC has been accused of hypocrisy over its decision to spend $500,000 ($UK200,000 Pounds) to block a Freedom Of Information request about its reporting in the Middle East. The BBC which has made extensive use of the FOI requests in its 'journalism' and is refusing to realease papers in an eternal enquiry". I rest my case. p/s Who would want to pay an exorbitant TV Licence Fee annually, as they do in England, so as the BBC can fill your screens with an interminable 'over representation of gays' (cooking, interior decorating, real estate and range of the most insipid programs unimaginable ) Would you pay for that type of TV ?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".