69 million page views

I Do not agree with you Dr. Pipes

Reader comment on item: "Iraqis Evict Palestinian Refugees"
in response to reader comment: Interesting statement from Dr. Pipes

Submitted by Debanjan Banerjee (India), Jul 24, 2009 at 05:48

Dr. Pipes,

I do not agree with your above comment that Palestinian refugees can not get asylum in USA simply for the reason that they are not useful against the Islamic government in Iran. By that argument , the refugees from Darfur in Sudan should also not be liable to get asylum in USA since they are also not that useful against Iran. Kindly answer.

And on your contention that the past sins of the MEK (and they are quite serious sins) should be forgiven for the matter that this group is now useful against Iran is also not a valid argument. US government previously worked with people like Osama Bin Laden who can also be categorized as anti-Shiite and thereby useful against Iranian government. Does that mean Israel and the USA should approach the likes of Osama for stopping the Iranian nuclear program ? Kindly answer.

Thanks & Regards

Debanjan

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

I was talking about political support, not immigration, with regard to the MeK.

There is no record that the U.S. government worked with bin Laden; and if it, I condemn that.

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment

Reader comments (9) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Passports as a mideast reality changer? [211 words]PezDispenserJul 19, 2009 14:11159024
How soon we forget! [308 words]FroikeJul 17, 2009 08:21158947
WHAT IS A PALESTINIAN ?? WHO IS A PALESTINIAN ?? [22 words]CAROLJul 13, 2009 00:30158792
Palestinians? [55 words]BertJul 12, 2009 10:59158779
Interesting statement from Dr. Pipes [88 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Debanjan BanerjeeJul 12, 2009 04:36158772
I Do not agree with you Dr. Pipes [151 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Debanjan BanerjeeJul 24, 2009 05:48158772
US as a dumpster of Militant Islam. [374 words]SvetJul 11, 2009 21:41158764
help us [79 words]aliFeb 1, 2006 14:1333415
Ali, let's make a deal [69 words]Peter HerzJul 16, 2009 15:4833415

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to I Do not agree with you Dr. Pipes by Debanjan Banerjee

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)